Agenda - Council - 10/22/2002 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Associate Planner Wald stated the Northfork Architectural Review Board faxed a letter today stating they are not willing to approve Mr. Shappells request to, accessory structure, however they would be willing to approve a 34xo0 structut~e~ ':'If Mr."~,! Shappell constructed a 34x30 structure he would' meet City Code requirements,,and i~ould not need a conditional use permit. Staff is recommending the Planning Co~Si° the conditional use permit request due to the fact that the Northfork Archite~:~'~ Review ~o:ard denied Mr. Shappells request and therefore the applicant will not be p~)ted to const~f.-a 34x50 accessory structure. ' ,:< Mr. Shappell, 9325 164~ Lane, stated he had talked to the Arch/~e~ral~iew Board and they a~:e in azeement that he oan build the structure, 34×30 rathe.~/i'34×S0. ~ stated he wanted to get on the next City Council agenda because the Archite~'~'~'i;:Review.,Board was not reviewing correct information related to the height of the structu!7~,-!iii~ "~;- .~ ,~,)5.~' ..... Chairperson Nixt asked staff to update him on the issue. H~'k~}aked th~,i:~ue ~'S"should they ~ant a square footage overage. He stated at this point he is not incline}'~¢}':i~rmit this when there is an issue with the Architectural Review Board. Chairperson Nixt asked if they have gr~,tea,,0nything tike this. Associate Planner Wald stated, tb~'h~been on~ ;{~i'i~ase.where a lark~7~'verage was granted. Chairperson Nixt stated that he does nofi. lf~el there:~'~.;-4nough'ifad~t~'"~o .justify granting this. He stated he would be more sympathetic if'*t~e nei~b'0rs were not objecting to this through the Review Committee.inThis subdivision, so th~y:.¢6uld table thi'S' until it could be worked out or they could deny,)this and the-applicant could 'aiSppal to the City Council. Mr. Shapp~l~F~tated he doe~:~'~ve a letter from;'i{h~V~urrounding neighbors stating they do not approvethis~one hundred pe~ht but would no~¢~e to the meeting and object. Chairperson ~r~;stateahe d';;~-'ha~e ~h~:ab~;r~ty to put up. a fairly large accessory structure. Commission:~'Kociscak.stat~' he was asking too much and the last time Mr. Shappell was there, his closest nefghbor did not want this built and this holds more weight. · Motion by Ch?",~erson Nixt, seconded by Corm'nissioner Kociscak, to recorm'nend that City Council adopt!, findings of fact deleting findings, twelve, thirteen, and eighteen, taking out '~.:i"hazardous-of' in finding number sixteen, finding fourteen should be "will not", the variable in 'fi~dings: ~ft4en, sixteen, seventeen, and nineteen should be "will" relating to David and Sandra ShapPet]:s request for a conditional use permit to exceed the accessory building size restr/ction. -186- Planning Commission/October 10, 2002 Page 2 of 20 I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I