Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />! <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Further discussion: Chairperson Nixt stated that findings one and two are fine and he <br />to have a finding inserted, if not already in there, that the Architectural Review <br />two separate occasions has denied the request of the applicant'. <br /> <br />Motion Carded. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Commissioners <br />Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioners Johnson and Watson. <br /> <br />Motion by Chairperson Nixt, seconded by Commissioner <br />Council deny David and Sandra Shappell's request to exceed <br />based on the findings of fact, and adopt a resolution declaring <br /> <br />r~ <br /> <br />that <br /> <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, <br />Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Johnson <br /> <br />Brauer, and Reeve. <br /> <br />Case #3: <br /> <br />Request for Sketch Plan Approval <br />Bulow, Inc. <br /> <br />Case of <br /> <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon stated that the City received an <br /> <br />requesting a minor subdivision in <br />would like to develop a 6,000 sI <br />subdivision would combine <br />The new lot is proposed to <br />designated for a commercial lot as <br />Bulow Inc. and is a ten-foot wide lot <br />currently contains <br />applicant will <br /> <br />Motmn by Cl¢/a~rperson <br />for Matt;~';:.iPonds 2® and <br /> <br />one lot from two <br /> t office bui <br /> of the <br /> <br />Bulow Inc. <br />Bulow Inc. <br />ew lot. The minor <br />Ponds subdivision. <br />is a vacant lot and was <br />Oultot A is owned by <br />Ponds subdivision. It. <br />the two lots are combined, the <br />ess easement for the use of the trail to the City. <br /> <br /> Kociscak, to approve the sketch plan <br /> the City Council grant final ptat approval <br />letter dated September 27, 2002. <br /> <br />Motion Carried. Chairperson Nixt, Commissioners Kociscak, Brauer, and Reeve. <br /> Commissioners Johnson and Watson. <br /> <br /> Case #4:' ';; ;: }3.Request f0i~:Sil:e:;Plan Review for Mallard Ponds Office Building; Case of <br /> <br /> Principal ela~i~ Trudgeon explained that the City received an apPlication from Bulow Inc. <br /> proposing to c~nStmct a 6,000 square foot multi-tenant office building at the northeast coruer of <br /> <br /> '::" :''r'~County Highway 116. The applicant is proposing to develop a one-story <br /> building consisting of 6,000 square feet. The site plan indicates the building <br />'~3i~i'~b.e,sp3~i~'into four 1500 square foot office spaces. The site is currently zoned Planned Unit <br />Deyel~Pment (PUD). The Development Agreement for the Mallard Ponds subdivision, which <br />th~iii~'~ is part of, contained language that allowed the subject property to be developed as a <br /> <br />Planning Commission/October 10, 2002 <br /> Page 3 of 20 <br /> <br />87- <br /> <br /> <br />