Laserfiche WebLink
staff to h/re an independent consultant to review the citizen petition and provide guidance to <br />the City Council. <br /> <br />For your information, the City Council will need to make a decision on whether an EAW is <br />needed by November 22, 2002. <br /> <br />If the issues raised by the Citizen Petition are resolved and the City Council wants to consider <br />approving the preliminary plat, staff would recommend that approval be contingent on the <br />following items: <br /> <br />a. Compliance with City Staff Review Letter dated August 20, 2002, Revised September 20, <br /> 2002, Revised October 4, 2002, Revised October 18, 2002. <br />b. The applicant recei¥ing site plan approval of the two-unit townhomes. <br />c:.Language being inserted into the Development Agreement that define the financial <br /> responsibilities between the City and the Developer regarding extension of sanitary sewer <br /> tnmk lines. <br />d. The City Council finding that an EAW is not necessary or warranted for the Villas of <br /> Meadow Point subdivision. <br />e. Other items as required by City Council <br /> <br />If the plat is proposed to be denied, findings of fact should be adopted first. Staff will have basic <br />findings of fact available for the City Council at the October 22, 2002 meeting. Additional <br />findings will need to be added by the City Council in relation to the denial of the preliminary <br />plat. <br /> <br />Will be based on your discussion. <br /> <br />City Council Action: <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Review Checklist: <br />Community Development Director <br />Associate Planner <br />Principal City Engineer <br />City Engineer <br /> <br />CC 10/22/02 <br /> <br />-303- <br /> <br /> <br />