Laserfiche WebLink
SUMMAtkY OF PROJECT 5: <br />TH 101/169 (ELK PdVER) TO SL~'FISH LAKX BOULEVARI) (tLd, MSEY) <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Proj eot <br />Description <br /> <br />Speed <br />:'Performance <br /> <br />Operations <br />(L, OS) <br /> <br />Safety <br /> <br />Signal Risk <br /> <br />.,~2CeSS <br /> <br />Benefit-Cost <br /> <br />PERFORI¥£4,NCE ISSUES <br /> <br />Construct Y-lane Freeway. (See Figure 5.3-5A, 5.3-5B, & 5.3-5C) <br /> <br />2025 overall segment speed if project [s completed: 68 m~h. <br /> <br />2025 overalI seg-ment speed if either project [s aor completed: 36 mvh <br />Avg. speed over high priority portion.of TH 10 assuming that ali high pr/ority <br />projects are constructed: 6I mph ~ <br />Avg. speed over high pr/_oriry portion of TH 10 assuming that all high. priority <br />projects bur this one are constructed: 4,9 ..mph <br /> <br />2025 ~brecasted level-of-service without project: LOS F <br />2025 forecasted level-of-service w. it.h. project: LOS A <br /> <br />TH 10 Intersections/Segments Above Critical Rate: <br /> · TH I0 for almost all of the entire project [eriCh exceeds the segment critical <br /> rote. <br /> <br />TH 10 [ntemections/Se~ments Above IRC Threshold: <br /> · TH 10 tbr atmosr all' of the entire project length exceeds the se~*~nenr IRC <br /> threshold. <br /> <br />This project should reduce crash rates below the critical rate and IRC threshold. <br /> <br />Moderate $ [~nal Risk intersections: · 165th Street (Elk River) <br />High Si~o-n, al Risk Intersections: · Jarvis Street (Elk River) <br />With th/s project, sig-nat proliferation risks will be eliminated. <br /> <br />Public street access would be severely reduced and all of the private accesses <br />would be eliminated. . <br /> <br />The project net present value (benefits - costs) is: $37.680,000 <br />The project benefit-cost.ratio is: 1.56 <br /> <br />NOTE: Costs and benefits shown here are in 2001 dollars. The salvage value is not sh. own here <br />but is part of the calculations. <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />i <br /> <br />i <br />I <br /> <br />-430- <br /> <br />TH/0 IRC Study <br />Corridor lklanage/nen[ P!an <br />No. 81.~260d <br /> <br />5-34 <br /> <br /> danua~. 2002 <br />[dent~fication, £vatuatt'on, and <br /> Selection of Alterncttives <br /> <br /> <br />