My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 11/26/2002
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2002
>
Agenda - Council - 11/26/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 11:13:29 AM
Creation date
9/3/2003 10:47:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
11/26/2002
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
321
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />I <br />i Mayor Gamec stated that he thought the proposed development looked great. <br /> Mr. Peterson stated that he would be shocked if they had any strong objection from any of the <br />I neighbors. <br /> Councilmember Anderson inquired if the property owners will have an option as to what trees <br />Iwill stay and what will be removed. ' <br /> <br /> Mr. Peterson replied that they are planning having the lots be custom graded to minimize the <br /> lOSS. <br /> <br /> Counc~lmember Kurak stated that she appreciated Mr. Peterson s efforts ~,,,,:a <br />"! City and working with neighbors, saving the trees, and willingness tO Q~st~'~ted cove~ <br /> on those buffering trees. ~' <br /> <br /> Councilmember Zimmerman stated that they needed to lei' development.~go through th~ <br /> process and not give an opinion until the public heating has be . <br /> <br /> 2) Plants and Thmgs :~! ~?~ x.,. <br /> <br />I City Administrator Norman st~,t.:ed that he had:~ken ~i~!he Counc~::}~ng a work sessmn in <br /> July regar&ng a developmenl~pt!amfor the Pl~,,'~iand ~:sa¢. Sta~ received a response <br /> from the owners 0,f Planfs~and ~gs that th~'~ ~,make~commitment at this <br /> t~me. Staff has; af.,tae!~ of trust wx~:;working w.,i~:i,~~Hxckman: e of past instances.: The <br /> concern staff has:,~S that Mr. H~c~ has no ~!~s and that the ex~stxng bmldmgs wall remain. <br /> Staff has d~scussed:;~e msue'0~f~!~c~ng the pr~ w~thin the proposed moratorium w~th the <br /> Xkomey and'th ::A, tt; ;:'E ;! arcated th~};ac~ng the property ~n a moratorium xs enough <br /> ~,~.t~?~:!;5;,'q~ctmn to"~stoP'~Tuture~de~elopment pl Crty havmg to start condemnation action. <br /> <br /> ?,~_¥';. Mayor Gamee!sl:a~ed ~at:~t corner has been a problem for along t~me. <br /> <br /> '~;(~}~?., Councilmemb~:;~i~e~i~:~ktated that some~ng has to be done wi~ Highway ~10 M ~e ne~ <br />I <br /> :~:{~?}:~mre Uecause~;~) have no second~ road to back up Highway ~10. <br /> <br />I ':(C~une~emBer Hendfiksen stated that there has been a long hstou of broken promises' on ~e <br /> 8t~6~..~ ~gs prope~. His concern is ~at ~y co~ent ~at mght be made they have <br /> to: view with a cegain ~ount of skepticism. He felt ~at the moratorium was the way to <br />I proceed. <br /> <br />City Council/October 15, 2002 <br /> Page 3 of 4 <br /> <br />-155- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.