My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 11/26/2002
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2002
>
Agenda - Council - 11/26/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 11:13:29 AM
Creation date
9/3/2003 10:47:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
11/26/2002
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
321
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-226- <br /> <br />an EAW is needed by November 22, 2002. If the issues raised by the citizen petition are resolved <br />and the City Council wants to consider approving the pr~iiminary plat, staff' would recommend <br />that approval be contingent on the following items: <br /> <br />a. Compliance with City Staff Review Letter dated August 20, 2002, Revised September 20, <br /> 2002, Revised October 4, 2002, Revised October 18, 2002. <br />b. The applicant receiving site plan approval of the two-unit townhomes. <br />c. Language being inserted into the Development Agreement that define the financial <br /> responsibilities between the City and the Developer regarding extension of sanitary sewer <br /> trunk lines. <br />d. The City Council finding that an EAW is not necessary or warranted for the Villas of Meadow <br /> <br /> · Point subdivision. <br />e. Other items as required by City Council <br /> <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon noted that since the last meeting the plat has been changed to provide <br />for a private road to accommodate t-he single family, lots, which resulted in a reduction, of one <br />single family lot. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen stated that the City already has townhome owners with private roads <br />knocking on their door for the City to plow them which is why some of them are opposed to <br />private roads period. <br /> <br />Councilmember Anderson inquired if the single family homes would be part of the association. <br /> <br />Principal City Engineer Olson replied that the single family homes will be part of the association <br />and will be able to use the community building being proposed for the center of the site. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak inquired if they could address the grade difference between the <br />development and Mr. Bridwell's property. <br /> <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon explained that Mr. Bridwell originally had concerns with the original <br />grading plan that showed' some. grading 'on his property, which has been eliminated by the <br />construction of a retaining wall. He also noted that the developer has also been in the contact <br />with Mr. Bridwell and they have possibly reached an agreement to purchase his property. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak inquired if the grade issue was being created by the developer. <br /> <br />Principal City Engineer Olson replied that the steep grade already exists. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak verified that there would not be any land moving around outlot B. <br /> <br />Principal City Engineer Olson replied that that was correct. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen stated that Mr. Bridwell had objected to the road connection going to <br />his property~ ' <br /> <br />City Council/October 22, 2002 <br /> Page 27 of 36 <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I' <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.