My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 11/26/2002
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2002
>
Agenda - Council - 11/26/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 11:13:29 AM
Creation date
9/3/2003 10:47:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
11/26/2002
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
321
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />In addition, the report updates a previous report prepared on May 14, 2002, which examined <br />cumulative traffic impacts of Evergreen Point, Alpine Meadows, Wildlife Sanctuary 2nd <br />Addition, and Sunflower Ridge. The cumulative effects of the above mentioned subdivisions <br />along with the additional units associated with Villas of Meadow Point were evaluated for its <br />impact on the three major intersections, which include TH 47 and Alpine Drive, CSAH 5 and <br />Alpine Drive, and CR 57 and Alpine Drive. Each of these intersections currently operates at a <br />high level of service, even during the AM and PM peaks. The additional traffic generated <br />from the surrounding developments are not expected to deteriorate the level of service of the <br />intersections after full build-out. <br /> <br />At the October 8, 2002 City Council work session, the City Council agreed in concept to a <br />funding arrangement that was proposed by the Developer. The funding proposal that the City <br />Council conceptually agreed to is as follows: <br /> <br />The City agrees to contribute a not to exceed amount of $150,000.00 to the cost <br />of constructing a 30" trunk sanitary sewer line from its existing location to the <br />north right-of-way of Alpine Dr. NW. <br />The City agrees to allow the DevelOper to utilize all of the trunk fee money <br />generated from this first phase of 44 lots as well as an additional 156 lots that will <br />be platted in the future on land under the Developer's control within the "triangle" <br />during a five year period following the date of final approval of Villas of Meadow <br />Point. The "triangle" is defined by the right-of-ways of AlPine Drive NW, County <br />Road 5 (Nowthen Boulevard.), and County Road 57 (Sunfish Lake Boulevard.). <br />The trunk fee money that the City is allowing the Developer to utilize is to be used <br />to construct the 30" trunk sanitary sewer line through the site and across Co, unty <br />Road 5 at a depth and alignment as approved by the City Engineer. <br />If the cost to construct the above mentioned 30" trunk sanitary sewer line through <br />the site plus a 25% increase for design, contract administration, legal, and <br />contingency is below that which will be generated from trunk fees, then the <br />difference will be due to the City from the Developer upon final 'platting. of a <br />subsequent phase. <br /> <br />On October 11, 2002, the City of Ramsey received notification from the Minnesota <br />Environmental Quality Board that a valid citizen petition requesting that the City require an <br />Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EA, W) be completed for Villas of Meadow Point. The <br />petition raises three potential environmental effects that could occur with the Villas of Meadow <br />Point development; 1) Harm to the natural habitat of the Blanding's Turtles, 2) Reduction of the <br />habitat for other wildlife, 3) Decline of water quality and supply. Under State law, the City <br />Council cannot make any final government approvals of a project until the need for an EAW has <br />been determined. State Statutes allow for the City Council to take up to 30 working days to <br />make a decision. The developer, in response to the petition, has indicated that they will be <br />bringing forward information addressing the citizen petition,s concerns at the October 22, 2002 <br />City Council meeting. Under Statelaw, the City has 30 working days to make a determination on <br />whether an EAW shall be conducted. The first item that the City Council must consider is to <br />make a decision on the citizen petition. The City Council will need to make a decision on whether <br /> <br />City Council/October 22, 2002 <br /> Page 26 of 36 <br /> <br />-225- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.