Laserfiche WebLink
TRANSPORTATION (V) <br />V -A Transportation and Transit Funding <br />Metro Cities supported passage of the 2008 Transportation Finance bill, This legislation <br />allows for necessary resources for MnDOT, the county road system and the MSA road <br />system, and will help make up for the lack of state resources over the last twenty years. <br />Metro Cities was proud to be part of the effort to secure this base level funding. <br />However, the resources contained in the transportation finance bill represent only half of <br />the need in our counties, cities and state. Metro Cities recognizes the need for additional <br />transportation funding statewide, and will continue to advocate for additional resources to <br />maintain our transportation infrastructure. In addition, cities still lack the authority to use <br />additional tools for city street improvements such resources continue to be restricted to <br />property taxes and special assessments. It is imperative that alternative authority be <br />granted to municipalities for this purpose to relieve the burden on the property tax system. <br />V -B Regional Transit System <br />The Twin Cities Metropolitan Area needs a multi -modal regional transit system that serves <br />both commuters and the transit dependent. The transit system should be composed of a <br />mix of HOV lanes, Bus Rapid Transit, express and regular route bus service, exclusive <br />transit ways, light rail transit and commuter rail corridors designed to connect residential, <br />employment, retail and entertainment centers. The system should be regularly monitored <br />and adjusted to ensure that routes of -service correspond to the region's changing travel <br />patterns. <br />Metro Cities strongly supported the % cent sales tax which was passed by the 2008 <br />Legislature. This tax will be levied in the Metropolitan Area and dedicated to transit. The <br />sales tax represents a commitment to investment in our region's transit ways. It will be <br />important to direct these revenues purposefully, and to avoid subsidizing areas of transit <br />funding that are the responsibility of the Legislature and Metropolitan Council. Metro <br />Cities is opposed to legislative or Metropolitan Council directives that constrain the ability <br />of metropolitan transit providers to provide a full range of transit services, including <br />reverse commute routes, suburb -to- suburb routes, transit hub feeder services or new, <br />experimental services that may show a low rate of operating cost recovery from the fare <br />box. <br />V -C Transit Operating Subsidies <br />The Twin Cities metropolitan area is served by a regional transit system that is expanding <br />to include rail transit and dedicated bus ways. Any operating subsidies necessary to <br />support this system should come from a regional or statewide funding source. The <br />property taxpayers of individual cities and counties should not be singled out to fund the <br />2011 Legislative Policies 35 <br />