My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council Work Session - 12/07/2010
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council Work Session
>
2010
>
Agenda - Council Work Session - 12/07/2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 2:50:18 PM
Creation date
12/2/2010 4:25:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
12/07/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
95
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
operation of specific transit lines or routes of service within this regional system. The <br />Metropolitan Council must find a stable and growing revenue source to fund the operating <br />budget for Metro Transit. MVST revenue projections have not been reliable and as a result <br />the Met Council is continuing to operate at a funding deficit. The ; / 4 cent sales tax will be <br />used, in part, to fund operating costs on designated transit ways in the Metropolitan Area. <br />It is critical that this tax not be allocated in ways that allow the Legislature or Met Council <br />to abrogate their responsibilities for funding operating costs for the metropolitan transit <br />gUO'Prn <br />V -D Street Improvement Districts <br />Metro Cities supports the authority of local units of government to establish street <br />improvement districts. Street improvement districts allow for cities in developed and <br />developing areas to fund new construction as well as reconstruction and maintenance <br />efforts. <br />The street improvement district is designed to allow cities, through the use of a fair and <br />objective fee structure, to create a district or districts within the city where fees will be <br />raised but must also be spent. Street improvement districts would also aid cities under <br />5,000, giving them an alternative to the property tax system and special assessments. <br />Metro Cities also supports the further investigation of implementation of the Center for <br />Transportation Studies' research on value capture. The research identifies additional tools <br />for the legislature explore offering to cities as options to finance transportation <br />improvements. <br />WE Highway Turnbacks & Funding <br />Metro Cities supports jurisdictional reassignment or turnback of roads on a phased basis <br />using functional classifications and other appropriate criteria subject to a corresponding <br />mechanism for adequate funding of roadway improvements and continued maintenance. <br />Metro Cities does not support the wholesale turnback of county roads without the total <br />cost being reimbursed to the city in a timely manner. <br />Cities do not have the financial capacity, other than significant property tax increases, to <br />absorb the additional roadway responsibilities without new funding sources. The existing <br />municipal turnback fund is not adequate based on contemplated turnbacks. The 2008 <br />transportation finance bill will add approximately $6 million to the Metro Turnback Fund, <br />bringing the fund up to $20 million, which falls short of the $100 million needed. <br />Metro Cities supports additional funding for municipalities that are assuming the role of <br />maintenance and upkeep on city streets that maintain a level of traffic consistent with state <br />highways. Cities should be compensated for providing a service that traditionally has been <br />borne by the state. The state has abrogated its responsibility for maintaining major roads <br />36 Metro Cities <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.