Laserfiche WebLink
-t8- <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Board Members Kociscak, Brauer, and Reeve. <br />Voting No: None. Absent: Board Members Johnson, Sweet, and Watson. <br /> <br />The public heating closed at 7:43 p.m. <br /> <br />Board Business <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt called the Board of Adjustment meeting back to order at ).m. <br /> <br />Motion by Chairperson Nixt, seconded by Board Member Brauer, t~ad:bpt #02-06- <br />132 adopting Findings of Fact #0616 favorable to Stephen ~g~,~nda ' lng to a <br />request for a variance to accessory structure setback requirement? <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chai, erson Nixt, Board M~ers Brau~! Kocisc , ~d <br />Voting No: None. Absent: Bo~d Members Jonson, <br />Motion by Ch~icerson Nixt, seconded by Board Mem¢~ , to approve Stephen and <br />~onda Tfisko s request for a variance to ~cesso~ stmcm~ack~.::~ requirements and adopt <br />Resolution ~02-06-133 decl~ng te~s of ~[, <br /> <br />Motion ca, ed. Voting Yes: Chalmerson N~k~ Boa er~:~Brad'~:~ Kociscak ~d Reeve. <br />Voting No: None. Absent: Bored Members J;~0n, <br /> <br />Case ~3: Request fo~;fi Varian~ for Placement of an Accesso~ Structure Nearer the <br /> Front:PrOPe~ Lhe;~than the Prh~[pal Structure; Case of John Pur~s <br /> <br />Chai, erson Nixt cl~he re ~)~;~d of Adjus~ent meeting at 7:47 p.m. in <br />order to conduct the <br /> <br />C~erson Nixt called ~Public h~ng to order at 7:47 p.m. <br /> <br />'Presentation <br /> <br />Associate ?i~ ~3g'~0n stated the subject parcel is 7.15 acres in size ~d is zoned Plied <br />U~t Developm~(~0~hfork). City Code h~ established 40 feet as the ~ont yard setback l~e <br />in the rural distfi~:~e p~cipal dwell~g is located 176 feet ~om the ~ont propeW line. ~e <br />proposed detaChed accesso~ building will be approximately 126 feet ~om the ~ont prope~y <br />line. Ndghbofing houses me also located si~ific~tly beyond ~e 40-foot ~ont y~d setback <br />line; therefore the proposed detached accessou building will be compatible with su~ounding <br />structure setbacks. ~e site plan and pictures submitted reveal the propeW is si~fic~tly <br /> <br />Board of Adjustment/June 6, 2002 <br /> Page 6 of 15 <br /> <br /> <br />