Laserfiche WebLink
lot. A lot could be created that would be 2.5 acres in size and meet all applicable setbacks. <br />However, the lot would be irregularly shaped. The parcel containing the homestead will exceed <br />the lot size minimum of the new ordinance. He said it is Staff's opinion that the fact that the <br />applicant doesn't have enough area for a proper lot size because he dedicated right-of-way as part <br />of the Echo Ridge Estates is a self-created hardship. Under Section 9.03.05 Subd. 2(b)(2)(c) a <br />variance cannot be granted if the special conditions and circumstances causing the undue <br />hardship result from the actions of the applicant. Staff recommends the vari e denied for <br />the following reasons: 1) In regard to the 4 in 40 density restriction portiom variance, the <br /> <br />applicant is not showing a lot size of 10 acres in conformance with <br />or in conformance with the 2.5 acre lot size minimum proposed <br />(one lot); 2) The inability to create a parcel that will meet the new <br />hardship, due to the fact that the applicant previously dedicated <br />Ridge Estates subdivision; 3) It is possible for the applicant <br />minimum proposed under the new code and that als( <br />minimums for the existing homestead. <br /> <br /> as <br />a lot that <br />all of the re( <br /> <br />(both lots) <br />9 revisions <br />self-created <br />the Echo <br />acre <br /> <br />Citizen Input <br /> <br />Board Member Kociscak asked if Mr. Lon <br />the setbacks are not met. <br /> <br />was <br /> <br />his septic system since <br /> <br />Bob Longfield, 5751 177~ Avenue N.W., <br />he will move it. He noted the power lines <br />make the natural break. He,~ was <br />would prefer to not put He <br />than an outlot. He said <br /> <br />Principal Planner 2~d~epn pof <br />a 66-foot fi <br />said this is what Mr. <br /> <br /> but if that is required, <br /> is where he tried to <br />who maintain the road. He <br />prefer to create a buildable lot rather <br /> <br /> ons includes the requirement of <br /> property for the minor subdivision. He <br />not want to give up. <br /> <br />Mr. Loi/gfi~ld fi.om all the neighbors and they were in support of <br />thisi~i~osal. He a co' signatures to the Chairperson. He also confirmed he is <br />t~i' f~'e owner. ~;;,::i~, <br /> <br />Lynn':~cke~an, 17801 St¢}Trancis BouleV~d, stated the south end of her prop~ abuts the <br />no~h e~a~O'~e Long~eI~;ope~. She stated she moved to Rmsey specifically to have 10 or <br />more acre~'~'~::g'Be~s~:~'largest concern is ~e lea~ from the Ci~ stathg that ci, sewer and <br />water will be'~:}~[i:~'~ along the no,west com~ of hs prope~. She said she was not sure <br />where the prope~::~ne was and was concerned about losing their trees. She also questioned the <br />size of the acres, whether they would be independent or with ci~ sewer ~d water, ~d whether <br />ci~ sewer and water will be a requirement. <br /> <br />Board of Adjustment/June 6, 2002 <br /> Page 11 of 15 <br /> <br />-23- <br /> <br /> <br />