Agenda - Council - 07/09/2002 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

-64- City Engineer Jankowski stated the majority was to facilitate putting in the street. Mayor Gamec asked City Attorney Goodrich if he would prefer to have a vote on this. City Attorney Goodrich stated he would like a note in the motion that these changes were made. Councilmember Anderson asked Mr. Black how important was the doghouse lot. Mr. Black stated this lot was a prime lot and one of the nicer lots they would have. Councilmember Anderson stated it did not have a "playable" back yard when pertaining to families. She wanted to know what would be the possibility of digging the trees fi.om the right- of-way and moving them elsewhere because it would make good sense to save the trees in the right-of-way and would m~e i~ptlfor the reforestation they did not get into the plan. Mr. Black stated he~t~:~:~not have'~!}problem working with Mr. Boos on staking the trees and make them available :~r ~he .City.:~o~!¢em. Motion by Councitmembe ond~"~:~y Councilmember Anderson, to adopt Resolution #02-06- granting final pl'~t'/:;~plJ~al t~'Y;TThe PondS Second Addition contingent upon compliance with the City Sta~ Revie~"~ft~'~:~ated June 21, 2002, and the Developer entering into that development agreement witt/~e City approved at the City Council meeting on June 25, 2002 and with the change to item 23:11!i° ~a&~/~:'.i'd}~eloper is only initially allowed to remove trees contained to the right of way, an~I':~h~r wi~:,that area necessary to achieve a three to one back slope and to grade the building pad on Lo~ 2r~'~ ~;:.::~. Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Game6,,~.Counk/l~¢mbefs:;::~..Anderson, and Kurak. Voting No: Councilmember Hendriksen, and Zimmerm~?'~ *~¢)}~5;~ "~;"~:t-. Motmn by Counmlmember Gamec, seconded by Counc~lmember ~9n, that based upon the City Attorney's opinion, the May 14, 2002 action With regards,~/~in~'2~ee removal within the peninsula area is not legal based on State Statute as it wou!~i/dgihy approval of the final plat and based on that opinion, tree removal shall be permitted pursuant to the terms of the approved development agreement. Further discussion: Councilmember Anderson asked if there was a way to add that it was the law because she wanted the indication that although she voted for it, further tree removal by Royal Oaks within the peninsula, until the tree preservation ordinance is in place, is not a legal action to the best of their knowledge. City Attorney Goodrich stated they should state "based on the City Attorney's opinion, adoption of the tree preservation which would delay final plat, adoption of the motion to halt further tree removal by Royal Oaks within the peninsula which would delay adoption of the final plat is not permitted by State Statute and therefore they would adopt this resolution. Councilmember Hendriksen asked if the development agreement stated that as soon as a building permit was pulled, tree removal could be started. City Attorney Goodrich stated City Council/June 25, 2002 Page 18 of 33 I ! I I I I I I I i I I ! I I I I