Laserfiche WebLink
Final Site Plan Review Residence at The COR <br />December 8, 2010 <br />Page 7 of 11 <br />Grading and Drainage: The building floor elevation should be set to be above the adjacent grade of the <br />public streets while meeting ADA accessibility guidelines. The grade from the building to the property <br />lines and extending to the limits of the shared accesses must be set to match the plans for the future <br />buildings and parking ramp expansion. <br />The COR Development utilizes regional stonnwater ponds for rate control and water quality treatment. <br />Each individual site needs to provide additional water quality treatment through the use of rain gardens, <br />water quality treatment structures, or other BMP's. The plan is proposing to install a conventional system <br />sewer system (inlet structures and pipes) that lead to discharge points into the existing storm sewer <br />system adjacent to the site. Drainage calculations were received but additional information is required <br />for the appropriate sizing of the proposed treatment structures /manholes at the discharge points (Aqua - <br />swirl and Ecostorm structures). The model was developed showing these structures as a reach, and <br />therefore no outlet pipe sizing was provided at the tie -in to the public system; this info must be <br />incorporated into the model to justify treatment structure sizing and removal efficiencies, and resubmitted <br />for review prior to issuance of a building permit. The model must also be revised to account for the <br />entire contributing area (including the courtyard), as the flooding elevations for the ponding areas <br />around catch basins exceeds the first floor elevation of the building (broad crested weir input for <br />overflow points). Additional BMP's should also be considered and investigated to provide for some rate <br />control and lessen the need for downstream piping /structure sizing, and reduce the volume of water <br />leaving the site. <br />Please identify overflow routes for all the `ponding areas" around catch basins, especially in the <br />courtyard area and alleyway between the parking ramp and proposed liner building. While the revised <br />plans provide spot elevations and call out overflow points to explain drainage patterns, the model does <br />not provide the same level of detail and must be revised accordingly, including the 100 year event with a <br />partially blocked pipeThe City currently experiences freezing problems with the floor drains in the <br />northeast corner of the parking ramp and we do not want to take additional drainage into our stormwater <br />system; rather we would like to connect that existing system into the proposed storm sewer line in the <br />alleyway for an additional overflow point from the existing system. The proposed grades of the alleyway <br />are not tied into the grades of the existing parking ramp, and it appears as if up to 2' of grade different <br />will be experienced; how do you intend to treat this grade differential relative to appearance, safety, and <br />drainage? A maintenance plan should be considered for this area, and will be required for the overall <br />system to ensure timely maintenance and performance to the intended design. <br />Please provide additional information on the proposed courtyard area;is the proposed storm sewer in this <br />location intended as a separate line from the roof drainage ?. A combined line is not recommended. <br />Integration with the parking ramp (existing and proposed expansion) is key to the successful design of <br />both facilities and coordination must be understood on utilities /drainage, dedicated parking, access <br />locations, grades /elevations and transitions. There appears to be a coordinated storm sewer effort <br />between this project and the Suite Living project to the west; private cross drainage easements will be <br />required to outline responsibilities of each entity as it relates to ownership, maintenance, etc. <br />All proposed site storm sewer connections into the existing public system in the right -of -way must be <br />constructed with RCP pipe; no PVC or HDPE is allowed. The model must also be submitted to City staff <br />to verify that the receiving structures are adequate in size and downstream capacity to accept the runoff <br />from this project. All impacts to existing infrastructure for curb cuts and utility connections (streetlights, <br />hydrants, catch basins, streetscape, roadways, etc.) must be coordinated with City personnel prior to <br />impacts. These impacts should also include irrigation, bedding material, structural soils, etc., not just <br />