Laserfiche WebLink
in the R-3 U Zoning District be setback 35 feet from the edge of the fight-of-way. The applicant <br />is requesting a 10-foot variance to have the townhouse units setback 25 feet from the public <br />fight-of-way. The current codes are outdated. As part of the Chapter 9 rewrite, the front yard <br />setback for townhouse units along public streets w/il be 25 feet from the edge of the right-of- <br />way. This will ensure a 25-foot driveway and will give a land owner the potential to reach the <br />density prescribed for the land. Additionally, the shape of the parcel and location of wetlands <br />have dictated that more of the development be served by public streets than wo~71iS,normally be <br />expected. Since more public fight-of-way is needed, adherLng to the~ired setbacks <br />Significantly impacts the amount of units that can be located on the pard~ven the current <br />requirements for setbacks, which is counter to the medium density land~'i~i(!~esignation of the <br />parcel. City Staff recommends approval of the variance. ~ ~ .... ":i:'ii?ii~!~, <br /> <br />Citizen Input <br /> <br />Steve Miller, 5490 155°~ Lane, asked if the change in set~:':is approued, would it be <br />for more dense concentration of the townhomes. ~.~:~).~. ~ <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt explained the requested setback is to all;~!~':~P~licant to develop within the <br />limitations of the zoning district. He added 2; does allow for r~:0i~:dense concentration, though it <br />doesn't allow them to exceed the limitatio~:0,!f~e:zpning <br />Board Member Johnson added that the deve[0per's ~6PO§at~ }dSt m~}~ had more significant <br />variance requests. <br /> <br />Steve Sis, 5S00 15*~ [~ne,:~i~a:~f:~-~e~streets 4~;~:~blic or phvate. <br /> <br /> ~J::,~mbination of public and private. <br />Principal Planner T~dgeon answerq4!ii~ey will be <br /> <br />Mr. Sis inquired what:~difference ~S bct, qc. eer~:~ and medium density. <br /> <br /> Principal,.m~;r~rudgeo~(:~)tained the limit for medium is 7 units per acre, and the limit for <br /> <br /> 5:~P;meroy, 5430 155~:.!Lane, inqfiired how many units will be going in. She also expressed <br /> co~tcem:~that the wetland be abolished. <br /> <br /> ~no~p'-~;ri~me~ ~u~g~%~w~r~d ~ 10 ~n~s w~ b~ going ~n. ~ e~ea ~ w~d~ w~ <br /> not be filled~J::'.!: ::. <br /> <br /> Ms. Pomeroy co~ented if townhomes will be added to four corners, the City must be proactive <br /> about many factors, one being traffic. She noted students from that area walk to school and was <br /> concerned for their safety. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I' <br />I <br />I <br /> I <br />I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />-12- <br /> <br />Board of Adjustment/May 2, 2002 <br /> Page 4 of 9 <br /> <br /> <br />