Laserfiche WebLink
'1 <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> i <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br /> I <br /> <br />Pr/nc/pal Planner Trudgeon explained there will be trails and sidewalks throughout development. <br />He also stated a traffic generation analysis has been prepared to make sure it can handle this <br />traffic. <br /> <br />Motion by Board Member Kociscak, seconded by Board Member Brauer, to close the public <br />hearing. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Board Members Kociscak, <br />Voting No: None. Absent: Board Members Reeve, Sweet, and Watson. <br /> <br />and Johnson. <br /> <br />The public hearing closed at 7:41 p.m. <br /> <br />Board Business <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt called the Board of Adj <br /> <br />Motion by Board Member Johnson, seconded by <br />102 adopting Findings of Fact # 0607 favorable to <br />request for a variance. <br /> <br />Motion carded. Voting Yes: Chairperson <br />No: Board Member Brauer. Absent: Board <br /> <br />~bers <br /> <br />to order <br /> <br /> 7:41 p.m. <br /> <br /> Resolution #02-05- <br />to Edina Development's <br /> <br />Kociscak. Voting <br /> <br />Motion by B,o_ard Member Johnson, Kociscak to approve Edina <br />Developments request fo~:d.:;W~..~to front in the R3-U Zoning District and <br />adopt Resolution #02-05?!i0~:'declar/fi~!~erms <br /> <br />Motion carded. Vb.~hg yes: Johnson and Kociscak. Voting <br />No: Board Member B~au~:~, Reeve, Sweet, and Watson. <br /> <br />Case #3.<:'~'i:~7~qnest f°~::i~?,Varianee to Front Yard Setbacks for the Proposed mat <br /> <br />Pnb~c Hearing <br /> <br />Chai~o= Nixt called t~;~blic he~ng to order at 7:45 p.m. <br /> <br />Principal Pla~e~Tmdgeon noted Eight-Seven LLC is proposing to subdivide t~d on the <br />southwest comer of State H~. 47 and Alpine Dr. into 42 tow~ome u~ts. ~e prope~ is <br />zoned R3-U which allows for tow~omes up to a densi~ of seven u~ts per acre. Ci~ Code <br />states that the front yard setback for buildings located in ~e R3-U Zo~ng District be setback 35 <br />feet from the edge of the fight-of-way. ~e applic~t is requesting a 1 O-foot v~ce to have the <br /> <br />Board of Adjustment/May 2, 2002 <br /> Page 5 of 9 <br /> <br />-13- <br /> <br /> <br />