My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 06/11/2002
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2002
>
Agenda - Council - 06/11/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 11:09:05 AM
Creation date
9/3/2003 2:30:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
06/11/2002
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
249
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-30- <br /> <br />Mr. Peterson noted the curvy street that was proposed previously now complies with the 30 mph <br />design standards. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Kociscak, to close the public <br />hearing. <br /> <br />Motion Carded. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Commissioners Johnson, Kociscak, and Brauer. <br />Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioners Reeve, Sweet, and Watson. <br /> <br />The public hearing closed at 9:04 p.m. <br /> ';.~ <br /> <br />Commission Business <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt called the regular meeting of the Planning'C6mmission back to orc~fa~-9:04 <br />p.m. .~'~:~" ..~:i,. "?-:~ <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Com~fs~ianer..~K~biS'eak, to recommend that <br />City Council approve the preliminary plat for Sunflower PCidge;~o~ifingent upon approval of the <br />rezoning to R-3 Urban Residential and compliance with City Sf' ~aff, Review Letter dated April 24, <br />2002. '¢~ ....... - <br /> <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson N~)t, comn~i'~i°~ers ,lohnsar~' Kociscak, and Brauer. <br />Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioners R~eve, Sweei:ji:and-~aisoit. <br /> <br />Case #8: Request for;Site~:Plan Review o,f'Sunflower Ridge; Case of Oakwood Land <br /> <br />Presentation :~_~ : ._._.._..:.. ~.. ::.. ...... <br /> <br />Community Development Dire6~or Frolik stated Oakwood Land Development has applied for a <br />site plan re~"~'!ofa 126-~ni~-'~Ownhome development. The property is generally located in the <br />west o£'T~['~47-'and:'no~d~ o'~-~p~e Drive N.W. The property is approximately 18.6 acres in <br />si,ze; -_~*i'i a~res exclus~:-~ the '~'=d qbe site plan ~s proposing 126 tow~ouse units which <br />extm~,tes to a net density ~'6_.9 units'l~er acre. In accordance with the new multiple family street <br />poi~ay,, there is at least 6~'. main public street spine providing access through the plat, with <br />private-driveway collecto~S:, extending off the public streets. The proposed townhom¢ structures <br />are a comb~afion of stand~rd and lookout ~rade units that will be ~nished with maintenance free <br />siding, asphatC'shingl;¢~;'-masom-y brick aeeents, and maintenance free decks (some units will <br />have su~ooms"rather'fl'~an decks). City Code restricts lot coverage to 35%. Lot coverage on the <br />subject property ~'11 be approximately 15%. All of the units will contain 2 bedrooms and all <br />have the potential for a 3~ bedroom. The finished floor areas are approximately 1,350 square <br />feet, which exceeds City Code requirements. The current draft of the medium density residential <br />development performance standards proposes a 30 foot structure setback from plat boundaries <br />and a 15 foot separation between buildings. The buildings in Sunflower Ridge are proposed to <br /> <br />Planning Commission/May 2, 2002 <br /> Page 12 of 23 <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> i <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br /> I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I' <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.