Agenda - Council - 06/11/2002 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Motion Camed. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Commissioners Johnson, Brauer, and Kociscak. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioners Reeve, Sweet, and Watson. Case #7: Request for Preliminary Plat Review of Sunflower Ridge; Case of Oakwood Land Development Chairperson Nixt closed the regular portion of the Planning order to call the public hearing to order· p,m. in Public Hearing Chairperson Nixt called the public hearing to order at 8:59 p.m. Presentation Community Development Director Frolik stated has applied for preliminary plat approval of a townhome development Sunflower Ridge. The property is generally located north of Alpine Drive T.H. #47. In the previous case, a public hearing was held to rezone th¢~property to R-i Residential and to permit development of the property at a net derfsX~;'.~ot2:::~go exceed 7 ~r acre. The sketch plan proposed 131 units; the preliminary plat is p~p~6§ ~,~ts, ~¢~tes to a net density of 6 9 umts per acre when the wetlands are f~'~ored o~?!:i in "~¢'~ordance with the new · . . . '. -~:~,¢. .... ..... private street pohcy, the plan ~s proposing a ~aln pu~t~e*'street gh the project area and ~t extends north off of Alpine .D~7~::~nd contm~9~i}~?}~he north boundary of the plat, prowding access to the north. There,~:~;7,~i~'6~?~(9~public s~xtensions to the east into Evergreen Point. Per the Planning Co~si;n's req~ at the sketch plan review, another public street has been incorporateff~,¢td'"the plat t~!ibrovides aC~ to the west· It was also noted at the time of sketch plan rex/ie~':)that a m~;~:~;m~::~,~,~ays were onto the public streets. The developer has reworked ~e ,p~1i;e~:'~6~,;~7¢vate driveway collectors, and reoriented buildings so t_h.~t now 79'~;~f~e~i~'6 driveways ~i~il access onto private collectors. A preliminary grading anff~i,~ige plan h.~i;'?.~en provided. A preliminary utility plan has also been received. Coor~!inaioii:'~)i'~h-~adj~,c,¢nt Pi'~i~! need to be provided and a comprehensive plan should be proi%S~d. The curraht~mposai~uires approval contingent upon the aPproval of Wildlife S d ary 2 and Ever~bn, eoint. :~e final plat should encumber all wetlands and stormwater pdiid~:~ith drainage and ~ty easements. There should also be a 10 foot drainage and utility easemei4t.'. around the peri"~Zter of the plat. City Staff recommends preliminary plat approval subject ti~i:c'~mPlianc~ w,,i~h~;the City Staff Review Letter dated April 24, 2002. Brian Olson, Principal City Engineer, stated one of the issues to be resolved with the developers is the barrier type curb required on private streets. Planning Commission/May 2, 2002 Page 11 of 23 -29-