My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 06/11/2002
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2002
>
Agenda - Council - 06/11/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 11:09:05 AM
Creation date
9/3/2003 2:30:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
06/11/2002
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
249
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-64- <br /> <br />Mr. McDilda agreed. He explained that the intent of the group is to work through the <br />information and make a recommendation to the Council so that the Council is able to make and <br />informed decision. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec stated that he would like to see a tree preservation plan by September or October. <br />He also noted that he was not in favor of delaying The Ponds development until that process was <br />completed. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmennan stated that it is been made obvious that there is some language in <br />the Comprehensive Plan that is not being followed. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec inquired if the Council was in agreement with adding the issue to the next Council <br />agenda. <br /> <br />Consensus of the Council was to add the appointments to the environmental task force to the <br />next City Council agenda. <br /> <br />Mr. McDilda stated that the neighborhood group is willing to work with the Council on the issue. <br />What they are asking for is since the majority of the Ponds development has gone through the <br />clear cutting process they would like special consideration to be given along the peninsula until a <br />tree preservation plan is in place. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendfiksen stated that they have a Comprehensive Plan hat address the topics <br />and places emphasis on very high density. What they need to do is address the issues in a <br />meaningful way in the Comprehensive Plan relating to density and density transitioning. <br /> <br />Councilmember Anderson stated that many of the ordinances that need to be developed after the <br />Comprehensive Plan is adopted have not been completed yet, which is part of the problem. She <br />did not believe that the densities were an issue at all. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen replied that the densities in the Comprehensive Plan are much <br />higher than what some of the Councilmembers would have hoped for. With a higher density it <br />makes it almost impossible to save trees. <br /> <br />Councilmember Anderson stated that when Councilmember Hendriksen moved to reduce the <br />high density down to seven units an acre and medium density down to four units an acre there <br />was no medium or high density. In the Ponds Development there is no high density and the area <br />of iow and medium density do meet the standards of the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />Motion by Councillnember Zimmerman, seconded by Councilmember Hendriksen, to hold <br />development on the peninsula until a tree preservation ordinance is adopted. <br /> <br />Further discussion: Councilmember Anderson stated that if they delay the development they <br />might have a problem because when the developer agreed to remove two lots along the pond it <br /> <br />City Council/May 14, 2002 <br /> Page 8 of 33 <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.