Agenda - Council - 04/09/2002 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

-46- Ms. Horn stated that City Code also states that the application will not be accepted without a plan or the fees. There were 125 people that signed a petition against the development, so she does not want to be the only representation working with the developer. Councilmember Hendriksen recommended that they table action and direct staff to draft findings of fact in the negative and positive. If the property owner wants to reapply then they should do so appropriately. Motion by Mayor Gamec, seconded by Councilmember Hendriksen, to table action until March 12, 2002 and direct staff to draft findings of fact in the positive and negative. Further discussion: City Attorney Goodrich noted that if the applicant agrees to extend the 60- day rule the applicant could meet with the residents to develop a plan. Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Hendriksen, Anderson, and Zimlnern~an. Voting No: None. Abstained: CouncilmemberKurak Section 28 Principal Planner Trudgeon stated that the City received a request to change the land use from Places to Work to Mixed Use. The Planning Commission recommended the land use change unanimously. Councilmernber Hendriksen stated that the map does not reflect the staging of the property. Principal Planner Trudgeon replied that the map does indicate phasing rings. City Attorney Goodrich inquired if the text addressed the phasing. Principal Plam~er Trudgeon replied yes. Councihnember Kurak verified that they were only talking about the eastern portion of Section 28. City Attorney Goodrich replied that they are not dealing with the Kurak property so Councilmember Kurak could vote on the amendment Councilmember Hendriksen inquired if they change #12 any construction in the area would be subject to the tiering discussed on page 307. City Attorney GoodlSch replied yes. Principal Plam~er T~n_tdgeon noted that the language would have to be included in the zoning code. City Council/February 26, 2002 Page 22 of 35