Laserfiche WebLink
Case #1: Continued - Request for a Variance to Rear Yard Setback in the R -1 <br />Residential (MUSA) District at 5971 143" Circle NW; Case of Dale and <br />Sharon Grundberg <br />Presentation <br />Planning Manager Miller presented the Staff Report.. <br />Board Business <br />dicated <br />igating that re <br />1 state <br />ember Brauer stated <br />a ®.being used fo <br />k. The 1.o <br />cerned that <br />or all por <br />les. The <br />of <br />xtens • <br />tinted he p <br />n ` ` ed it. <br />Ms. Miller stated the applicant is willing to gr <br />60 day increments and the ordinance process to <br />days. <br />Chairperson Van Scoy asked. Mr. Grundberg <br />clarification that the porch was already constructed on <br />Dale Gnmdberg, 5971 143 Circle NW, th <br />the porch was constructed on the ho <br />acceptable to him. <br />Board Member Brauer stated it was comhiendahl; <br />land at the last meeting; he is <br />concerned about setting preced <br />it and say they are unawar <br />ordinance does for the ci <br />Associat <br />separa <br />publ <br />co <br />ope <br />the use <br />behind his <br />the rear yard setback is to keep living spaces <br />the amendment to the ordinance would look at <br />dedicat` ®'®arks and other permanent open areas, which could <br />etback concern. <br />1'ving <br />tikes more sense. Clearly there is nothing in back, there is no <br />ics and other kinds of things which could have an impact on <br />e should be clear that this is a pond and not an athletic field <br />Associate Planner it a: clarified that it is more than dedicated park, but something that will <br />permanently and phys e:„ly separate. <br />Associate Planner Gladhill asked the applicant if he understands that he can force a decision from <br />the Board this evening and asked if he is willing to give an extension for the decision and willing <br />to sign something to that effect. <br />Mr. Grundberg responded yes. <br />Board of Adjustment/December 2, 2010 <br />Page2of3 <br />d be done in <br />mately 60 <br />d the home and asked for <br />e purchased it. <br />the home in 1999 and <br />stated an extension is <br />neer Himmer offered the sale of <br />recedence for the City. He also is <br />where someone decides to enclose <br />m he has is asking what changing the <br />