Laserfiche WebLink
-62- <br /> <br />be to fill the area with houses instead of businesses and have a worse ratio of businesses to <br />residents. The smart growth opportunity site proposes 2,000 additional homes, which was once <br />intended as a business park. <br /> <br />Ms. Horn requested that when the Council considers the land use amendments they look at each <br />property individually and decide how they can move that many additional people into the City. <br />She felt that higher density developments should be located close to county roads and shopping. <br /> <br />Mark Labone, stated that some people are worried about the impact on schools others are saying <br />medium density will bring in less people. He felt what was important was getting accurate <br />information out to the residents so that they know the true impact of a development. <br /> <br />Richard Krueger, 7640 175t~ Lane NW, Ramsey, stated that people are worded about moving <br />traffic but when they add the river bridge crossing they will be adding more traffic and they need <br />to develop the City otherwise they wilt be a bunch of'farmers in the middle of the City. <br /> <br />Mr. Feges agreed with Councilmember Hendriksen regarding the approach to the town center <br />site. In their analysis and doing overlays on the site it becomes less of an option to put in <br />housing, but more of an option of an enterprise and business district. What they would see is <br />more like 800 to 1,000 housing units. A collaboration of everyone working together makes it <br />better defined. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen questioned in the model Mr. Feeges was referring to how many of <br />the units would be free standing and how many would be second or th/rd floor units above retail. <br /> <br />Mr. i~eges replied that about 60 percent would be free standing units and the other 30 to 40 <br />percent would be blending retail/commercial with housing. He explained that there is some <br />resistance with combination type of housing because it has yet to be proven successful in this <br />area. <br /> <br />David Elvig, Tungsten Street NW, Ramsey, stated that his main concern is with writing a good <br />document and plan to move forward with the town center: The land is vacant and nothing is <br />happening with it. It is not generating any income to the City as it currently exists. If they focus <br />solely on industrial it could present a problem. They learned in Chicago that they took a four <br />square mile area and turned a net revenue of 25 million dollars. The Met Council did not force <br />the pipe to be extended to Ramsey, but the City made the request and at that time they had <br />suggested that 49,000 units be connected. When the pipe was put it in the Met Council agreed to <br />a system of 19,000 units and the City is obligated to that mount. He felt that there is a way to <br />design townhomes so that they can get empty nesters and young professionals into the City. <br /> <br />Margaret Connolly, 16235 Kamocite Street NW, Ramsey, stated that she has lived in Ramsey for <br />many years and she has seen Ramsey do things that expedite a short term accomplishment. <br />Currently the city is part of a study on where to locate the river bridge crossing in which the City <br />has been asked to place land in a moratorium to accommodate that bridge. The City is also <br /> <br />Planning Commission Joint Meeting/January 24, 2002 <br /> Page 12 of 15 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I' <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />