Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman stated that he wants to make sure that the costs' the City charges the <br />contractor is higher than what they could do the work for to encourage them to do the work. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen stated that he was presuming that i~he fees would be collected to <br />cover any damage that would not be apparent initially. He did not feel that the. fees would be <br />used to cover the case where a contractor does a terrible job and breaks up a driveway and then <br />walks away because they paid their $20.00. <br /> <br />Consensus of the Committee was to direct staff to research the actual cost of replacing driveways <br />both bituminous and concrete and report back to the Committee. <br /> <br />Case #2: Approve Master~.,Trail Plan <br /> <br />Parks~tilities Supe~cf~)Boos st~d that last yem the CiW Council au~ofized ~e Park ~d <br />Recreation Co~issi~"'[o invite s~uests for proposals (~e) for'~ail pl~ng se~ices. ~e <br />M~ter Trail Plan, if';¢&red b[~eim:~puncil, is intended to be a comprehensive ~d detailed <br />trail pl~, which will ~;~;~:b¢~al ol for ~t applications. ~P's for Master Trail <br />Pla~ing Se~ices were m~i~d' d~¢~:to ~:consult~g ~s, speci~i~ng <br />desk[m, ~ well as ~n namra~ource:¢3prot~on. One of these fi~s declined to worUoad <br />concerns, and a fi~h fi~ inquired,;3:~bfi~5~fl not submit a proposal. LHB En~neers ~d <br />~ch~tects, ~S Co~orat~on, and S~ Co~ult~ng~.~.Group, Inc. dehvered proposes before the <br />November 6, 2001 submission d~ O~ ~er 15, 2001 the P~k ~d Re~eation <br />Co~ission discussed the prQect ~:';di?~ed th~f staff exm~nes the proposals ~d contact <br />references. At the Co~ission December 2 eet~g,~5~e Co~ission reco~ended ~at <br />LHB En~neers and ~chitects be selected ~ fi ~ &e ~ail pl~ng se~ices. <br />Dunng t~s s~e meeting, how to ~nd ~e ~t I~ m~ d~scussed. ~e Co~ission <br />requested ~at CiW Council au~ofize ~ moun~6t to e~ceed $55~00. ~e se~ices would be <br />hnded ~om ~e ~ail fees collected to date ~d ~ose to%e coll6~d h 2002 Trml fees ~e <br />deposited ~n the Park Trust Fund. <br /> . - ~ '~ <br />Counc~lmember Kurak stated that she w~ ve~ ple~ed th~i;~borhood meetings ~e included <br />in the proposaIs. <br /> <br />Parks/Utilities Supervisor Boos noted-that it was important to point out that the public <br />participation portion would be used as an in-kind match for the greenways grant application as <br />well. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak inquired if the $55,000 was currently in a fund' to pay for the plan and <br />how did LHB expect to be paid. <br /> <br />Parks/Utilities Supervisor Boos explained that currently in the Trail fees fund there is $28,000, <br />but staff anticipates to have several lots platted in 2002 in which they will collect trail fees from. <br />As to how LHB expects to be paid they can establish that as part of the contract. <br /> <br />Finance Committee/January 22, 2002 <br /> Page 3 of 9 <br /> <br />-10- <br /> <br /> <br />