My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/12/2002
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2002
>
Agenda - Council - 02/12/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 11:04:08 AM
Creation date
9/3/2003 3:47:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/12/2002
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
433
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-18- <br /> <br />hour not including mater/als. Staff recommended that following fees and charges to cover <br />administrative fees, inspection costs and contingencies to cover damage caused by contractors: <br /> <br />Permit fee for boring: <br /> <br />Permit fee for open trench: <br /> <br />Permit fee for overhead: <br /> <br />$75 plus <br />$15/driveway, $20/road crossing <br />$75 plus <br />$15/driveway, $20/road crossing plus <br />$2,000 bond with additional $250/ddveway, $I,000 road crossing <br />$75 plus <br />$.05/linear foot <br /> <br />If possible all work in existing ROW would require boring, with new construction trenching <br />would be allowed. ~ <br /> <br />Councilmember Hend~'L"i5 state~;~at many times 'a pit is dug to bore under a driveway and <br />then they plow in ttieLtflterdict. Ii_~i. inquired if that scenario would be considered a trench or <br />simply boring. How ~itl they dif~ntiate between the two. <br /> <br />Director of Public Works/P'ire C~fil;~api:~'..replied that he would not consider that type of <br />activity as boring. ~-~':? )~ ;~:-.?. ' ~13 <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendfiksen stated tha~:~e has no o~jection to what was proposed, but would like <br />the policy to ~clude how they will differp~¢~t~.~b~n a trench ~d bo~g. <br />Councilmember Zi~e~an inquired if a co~¢r comp!~}es a boring ~d it collapses in ~e <br />~mre would the Ciw be expected to fix it for $~2/ ~"'~'~*~i~;:' <br /> <br />Dkector of Public Works~ke C~efKapler repli~-:that sta~ ~o¢~t was that if~ere w~ going <br />to be a problem ~t would probably not happen right away'so the fee[ ~ey would be cheung <br />would cover ~e costs if they were to have to cut it out ~d repack ib:~ik~ <br /> <br />Councilmember ~derson stated that her concern w~ ~at ~e was a qmte ~ issue at the state <br />level that cities were ~g to make money with fees ~d ~i;~ees should really reflect the actual <br />costs of ~e job. <br /> <br />Director of Public Works/Fire Chief Kapler replied, that he had consulted with the Street <br />Supervisor to determine appropriate costs to accurately reflect the cost to do needed repair if <br />necessary. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman felt that more research needed to be done to make sure the fees <br />would cover costs incurred by the City if they had to make any repairs. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec recommended adopting the policy as written and then they could review the fees <br />further at a future meeting. <br /> <br />Finance Committee/January 22, 2002 <br /> Page 2 of 9 <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.