Agenda - Council - 01/22/2002 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

'222- That on November 5, 2001, the Ramsey Planning Commission recommended that the Interim Use Permit be granted for a three-year term. That the Subject Property lies within an area that may be designated in the future as right- of-way for a Mississippi River Bridge Crossing and/or Armstrong Blvd. right-of-way and also within the future Town Center area. That the proposed outside storage is permitted in the Industrial zoning district but needs to be located on a paved bituminous surface and enclosed with a fence. 14) That the proposed use will not adversely impact traffic in the area. That the proposed use will not be dangerous or detrimental to persons residing or working in the vicinity of the use or to the public welfare. 16) That the proposed use will not substantially or adversely impair the use, enjoyment or market value of surrounding properties. 17) That through 2005 the proposed use will be operated and maintained so as to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and such use will not change the essential character of the area. ARer 2005, because of the facts contained in finding #12 this finding may not be accurate. 18) That the proposed use will not Create additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services. 19) That the proposed use will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. 2o) That through 2005, the proposed use will not be disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses. After 2005, because of the facts contained in #12 this finding may not be accurate. 21) That the proposed use will not be hazardous to existing or future neighboring uses. 22) That the proposed use will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials and equipment and conditions of operation through 2005' that may be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare, by reason of excessive production of noise. After 2005,. because of the facts contained in #12 this finding may not be accurate. 23) That the proposed use will be in accordance with the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan through 2005 after which time the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan may be in conflict with the proposed land use. 24) That the proposed used will be in accordance with the intent of Section 9.03.04A Interim Use Permits of the City Code. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: RESOLUTION #02-01- Page 2 of 3 I I I i I I I I i I I I I