Laserfiche WebLink
il <br /> <br /> I <br />'1 <br />I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> I <br />I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />developer is held to the same performance standards as if urban services were available. It is <br />Staff's understanding that the developer is willing to construct an all masonry building with <br />pavement, curbing and landscaping. If the developer is allowed to proceed, the development <br />agreement would require the parcel to connect to urban services within 2 years of availability. <br />The proposed plat will be submitted to the Park Commission for review of park dedication <br />requirements on January 10. City Staff recommends sketch plan approval. <br /> <br />Commission Business <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson questioned how the agreement requiring <br />within 2 years of availability is being handled. <br /> <br />urban services <br /> <br />Community Development Assistant Wald explained this <br />development agreement. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by <br />sketch plan and direct the developer to proceed with <br /> <br />will be the <br /> <br />Wat approve the proposed <br /> .~7~;;v' . <br /> ~l~Carifl rezonmg stages. <br /> <br />Motion Carded. Voting Yes: Vice Chair <br />and Sweet. Voting No: None. Absent: <br /> <br />)ciscak, C <br /> Nixt and C( <br /> <br />Johnson, Watson, Reeve, <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARING/COMMISSION <br /> <br />Case #1: Request for a~Pr,e.~ary <br /> Oakwood Lfi~D~6pment <br /> <br />Vice Chair Kociscak~d6~ed the re ~omon <br />in order to call the '~b~i~ heafin <br /> <br />of <br /> <br />Pines 5th Addition; Case of <br /> <br />anning Commission meeting at 7:10 p.m. <br /> <br />Public Hearing <br /> <br />Vice <br /> <br />PreSentation <br /> <br />Co~7 Develo <br /> <br />th <br /> <br />hearing to order at 7:10 p.m. <br /> <br />irector Frolik stated that the City received an application from <br />for a subdivision to be named River Pines 5t~ Addition. The <br />west side of T.H. #47, immediately north of the existing Apple <br />~d. The property is currently located outside the boundaries of the <br /> <br />property <br />Ridge/River <br />MUSA and is z~ R-1 Rural Residential. She reminded the Commission that at their regular <br />meeting in September, they recommended that City Council approve an amendment to the <br />Comprehensive Plan to expand the MUSA boundary to include the subject property. They also <br />recommended that the City Council rezone the property to R-1 Urban Residential to facilitate <br />development of the property at urban standards. The City Council introduced the rezoning <br /> <br />Planning Commission/January 3, 2002 <br /> Page 3 of 18 <br /> <br />-25- <br /> <br /> <br />