Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Reeve, to close the public <br />hearing for Cases #3 and ~4. <br /> <br />Motion Carded. Voting Yes: Vice Chair Kociscak, Commissioners Johnson, Reeve, Sweet, and <br />Watson. Voting No: None. Absent: Chairperson Nixt and Commissioner Brauer. <br /> <br />The public hearing closed at 8:15 p.m. <br /> <br />Commission Business <br /> <br />Vice Chair Kociscak called the regular meeting of the Plannin <br />8:15 p.m. <br /> <br />order at <br /> <br />Motion by Johnson, seconded by Commis <br />adopt the Findings of Fact favorable to the developer <br />plat of The Ponds fi.om B-1 Business and R-1 Single <br />Residential, R-3U Residential, and Multiple Residential. <br /> <br />to a <br /> <br />that the City <br /> rezone the proposed <br />to R-1 Single Family <br /> <br />Further Discussion: C <br />develop procedures that are more obj <br />the developer works, we are operating <br />meets ordinance requirements, the City's <br />shape as a result of the previous <br />understands the concerns ;, he <br />that it should <br /> <br />that <br /> a <br /> <br />can do as a city to <br />of influence on how <br />the applicant largely <br />residents are in better <br />this case. He stated that while he <br />say that this is so out of bounds <br /> <br />Commissioner she She said many residents moved <br />here because of the ~il5~des complying with bottom line numerical <br />rules doesn't mean it i~"~a~i~. It is good to have people come in here that live in the area <br />and talk.abi~:i-taffeC~'~'~6~lives. This is the balance With the quality of life. She said she <br />~s happy/w~th the ~a~:~t ~t e ~developed. ~e Pl~ng Co~ssmn ~s here to help ~e <br />citiZ~'Work betweeff¢;ih~:~develo~:i~d the Comssion. <br /> <br />c~'~sion.r Watson st~ t~e nei~or~ooa ~as their conce~s ~ut me a~w~o~er is a~ia~ <br />by t~C3mp Plan and ha~.~ ~ht to develop as he w~ts. <br /> <br />Co~ission~V~~.~ented that in many resp~ts, ~e dewloper has done better th~ the <br />Comp Plan. C'~'l°ner Watson ,~eed. <br /> <br />Motion C~ed. Voting Yes: Vice Chair Kocisc~, Co~issioners Jonson, Reeve, Sweet, and <br />Watson. Voting No: None. Absent: Chai~ersonNixt and Co~issioner Brauer. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commission Reeve, to recommend that the City <br /> <br />Planning Commission/January 3, 2002 <br /> Page 11 of 18 <br /> <br />-33- <br /> <br /> <br />