My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 01/22/2002
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2002
>
Agenda - Council - 01/22/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 11:02:45 AM
Creation date
9/4/2003 8:58:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
01/22/2002
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
316
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-64- <br /> <br />that supported the freeway without expressing a preference for a corridor alignment. That <br />change was made and presented to the Council for consideration. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Anderson, seconded by Councilmember Hendriksen, to adopt <br />Resolution #02-01- accepting, supporting and adopting the TH i0 Interregional Corridor <br />Management Plan. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Councilmembers Anderson, Hendriksen, Kurak, and Zimmerman. <br />Voting No: None. Absent: Mayor Gamec <br /> <br />Case #4: Proposed Ordinance to Establish Density Transition Standards for New <br /> Residential D[v~!opment <br /> <br />City Administrator No~'stat~i!;~at the purpose of the Charter amendment that requires a <br />transition between n~¢' ~d existink~:iresidential development of differing densities is to mitigate <br />the impact new, high~r:density~{~:iden~igl development may have on adjacent lower density <br />neighborhoods. A sub'~;~~l.~/ri~ ~:~th issues related to Chapter 9 of the City Code of <br />Ordinances met between July and:~Nbvemb'~:.2000, to discuss the proposed Density Transition <br />Ordinance language. On No'~bef'(i:t4, 2db:0, the City Council introduced an ordinance to <br />establish density transition st~dards :~tW~h':: existing and new residential development. The <br />ordinance failed to receive the neces~ amount of.votes to pass during the regular meetings on <br />December <br />12th and again on Decem~ l~,~::20,0.07¢~:~ii~?.~'anuary 2001, the City Council discussed <br />density transition language in work }~i(~'~: ~tiliZi~k the services of Loren Gordon of HKGi. <br />Changes were made from the direction guide~ al~.'ihe CounCil work session and language was <br />once again presented to the Council on Feb~ry L3~ii!~"~:~i1'~,. The motion to introduce the <br />ordinance was made, however, died for lack ofa sec0h~i!to the motion. The City Council entered <br />into facilitator-led discussions of the Compreh~'~e <br /> . · and "Density Transition Ordinance, <br />with Larry Bakken during the months of July through November 20~1.7, During the final session <br />with the facilitator on November 26, 2001, 'the Council provided~ ~?~:::~direction for a Density <br />Transition Ordinance. The City has been working with the¢~nsi~i~ii~ransition Ordinance <br />language for an extended period of time. The Planning Co~S~ion did hold a public hearing in <br />October 2000, however, the language is 'different fi:om the language that is currently drafted for <br />Council consideration. Staff recommended that the Council either introduces the ordinance <br />establishing density transition standards and then send the language to the Planning Commission <br />for a public hearing, or wait on introduction until after the public hearing. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen stated that section c. Matching of Densities, the last sentence should <br />read may not be required or with the approval of the City Council. <br /> <br />Consensus was to amend the language as recommended by Councilmember Hendriksen. <br /> <br />Councilmember Anderson felt that Subd. 2.a.2. should be deleted. <br /> <br />City Council/January 8, 2002 <br /> Page 14 of 27 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.