Agenda - Council - 01/08/2002 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

-62- Councilmember Kurak noted that finding #10 should read will not. Motion by Councilmember Kurak, seconded by Councilmember Anderson, to adopt Resolution #01-12-__ adopting Findings of Fact # __ relating to a request from Oakwood Land Development to rezone certain property in Section 14 from R-1 Rural Residential to R-1 Urban Residential. Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Kurak, Anderson, Hendriksen, and Zimmerman. Voting No: None. City Attorney Goodrich noted that introduction of the ordinance does not need to be contingent upon Met Council approval. ~..~:~;;~. Councilmember Hendriksen:i~ri~red if it was appropriate to introduce the ordinance even though it is not a part of an approvalS[ Co~kehensive Plan. City Attorney Goodridh:replied yeSi'// ,.5~: Motion by Councilmember Kurak~:~ilsec0rid¢d by Councilmember Anderson, to introduce Ordinance #01-12- to rez~h~'~e~..p[:c~'~rty in Section 14 from R-1 Rural Residential to R-1 Urban Residential, based on the Finfdi~ ¢f Fact, and contingent upon Metropolitan Council approving the request for a Compreh~fisive Plan amendment to include the subject property in the MUSA. Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor GameCi:C~hcilmembers Kurak, Anderson, Hendriksen, and Zimmerman. Voting No: None. ,.-7:~- ,~.~:::.' ~ Case #5: Request for Sketch Plan Review of Ri~:br Pi~i/~¢:,5t~ Addition; Case of Oakwood Land Development, Inc. '~::; ~ Principal Planner Trudgeon stated that Oakwood Land:.i.D'~velopment has submitted an . ;~¢,::,? . . . application to the City for a subdivision to be named R~ver~P~nes 5th Addlt~on. The property ~s located on the west side of T.H. #47, immediately north of the existing Apple Pddge/River Pines neighborhood. The Planning Commission reviewed a sketch plan in September that proposed to subdivide the property into i3 single-family residential lots with urban services. During the discussion at the September meeting, it was unclear whether the plat acreage included the existing homestead to the east, and if it didn't, whether or not future public access to the east. should also be a consideration. The Planning Commission tabled approval of the sketch plan and recommended that the Developer provide options for future public access to the north and verify the status of the existing homestead to the east. The property is currently zoned R-1 Rural Residential and at the September meeting, the Planning Commission recommended that City Council approve a rezordng to R-1 Urban Residential to facilitate development of the property with municipal water and sanitary sewer. The Planning Commission also recommended that City Council/December 11, 2001 Page 18 of 25 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I