Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Wivoda stated that the lattice tower along Armstrong Boulevard is the ~ <br />aesthetically obvious tower in the City. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt Nquired ~ to how s=ongly CiW staffs feel about requMng ~e <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik replied quite strongly, because <br />on the west side of Ramsey Boulevard for new development and they <br />aesthetics in that area. ~.~ · <br /> <br />Commissioner Kociscak stated that the lattice tower a/lows ~?0ur C~:ers and a monol:role <br /> carriers,' <br />allows for three, but if the water tower is going to be ah rovide '~c~r more the <br />monopole might be more appropriate. <br /> <br />Mr. Hall replied that fi.om their standpoint they ,,,.,- <br />tower. He stated that the water tower location may not be <br />because':it is not directly adjacent to Highway #10. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt inquired if the <br />Commission makesthat <br /> <br />self supporting <br /> some carders <br /> <br /> opole if the <br /> <br />Mr. Hail replied that they <br /> <br />ulres. <br /> <br /> Chairperson Nixt stated that f'mding of f,fi~';~l 9 users" rather than "..four <br /> additional users.". And finding of fact "That the completion of the <br /> water tower, currently under construction, the opportunity for an additional cellular <br /> wireless antenna i{}e!~in'"~'i:~'~'e:t0roximity·'~ to >Iicants proposed location." <br /> <br /> Motion b~:?ClS~airperson Ni~t~¢ seconded by Wiv0da, to recommend that City <br /> Councit':.!iidopt Findings o;g::Fact as to a request from American Tower <br /> Corpb~ifi0n:';.fdr a anstruct a telecommunication tower at. 14165 <br />I R=sey <br /> <br /> Ae?~,:~'r~'$'~i'oa~.,~.Carr/ed. ¥0~g Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Commissioners Wivoda, Griffiths, 'and <br />· ~.~5¢i'i;¢¢o¢:*~;~ik, c'~,'::Voting No: "~N~e. .Abstain: Commissioner Reeve. Absent: Commissioner Johnson. <br /> <br />?' Motion by C0.~ission~('.i~6ciscak, seconded by Commissioner Wivoda, to recommend that <br />I ~i~ C~ty Councd app[ove the request for a cond~tmnaI use permit based on the Findings of Fact for a <br />~;:i}3~4'3,,:,monopole structure,, and adopt a resolution declanng terms of same. <br /> <br /> ':':..ii'.~i.!"!!~Motion Car~j':ed~.~ Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Commissioners Kociscak, Wivoda, and <br /> <br />! <br /> 'i::ii!.~r. if-fiths..~9~ihg No: None. Abstain: Commissioner Reeve. Absent: Commissioner Johnson. <br />I ,T~, - ,:; - <br /> CaS~ #g':' Request for Preliminary Plat Review of Orchard Hills; Case of Homestead <br /> '"'": ? Multi-Family Development <br /> <br />Planning Commission/December 5, 2000 <br /> Page 4 of 17 <br /> <br />-219- <br /> <br /> <br />