Laserfiche WebLink
Chairperson Nixt inquired as to when the traffic study ~ ill be compl'eted. <br /> <br /> C~W Engineer J~owsk~ rephed that the study w~lI be c~pleted prior to the next::Pla~m~ <br /> Co~ission meeting. · / g <br /> <br /> Co~msmner W~voda ~nqmred ~f the cu~e along~b~t S~eet ~s adeq[ 5[~ to keep <br /> down on ~e road / "~ · <br /> <br /> C~ En~neer J~ows~ rephed that he ~oug~that ~e cu~e wasta:goo~? :e~ ~' <br /> Co~issioner Wivoda inquired if ~ere weld be a bike path,~e develoi [ at. <br /> Co~uniW Development Assist~t r lied m ~/,will be a bi~a~$ ~ along T.H. ~47. <br /> <br /> Motion' by C0=issioner rocisc~, ~onded by Co~iss~%~.Z~¢~% r~ ~6~end that CiW <br /> . . . · . .. . · . . . "~?~¢~?~:;'~;Vr . . . <br /> Council approve the prehm~n~plat for Orchard. H~lls cont~n~?~pon comph~ce wtth C~W <br /> StaffRewew letter dated Dece~r 5, 2000. ' ~ <br /> <br /> Motion C~ed. Voting ~s: Chal~m~t, Comssloners Komscg~:~eve, Gnffiths, and <br /> ~ivoda. Voting No: ~¢e. absa~~~er~Jokson. <br /> Case ~3: Request ...... for SiC~'~lan ~'kiew~:~.~,,,,~ of O r c~>~f~ms~ ~{~ase~e~¢~.~:~ '~:~;;* '~:,,>~. of Homestead. Multi- <br /> <br /> Co~u~ Develo~em Assist~t Walff~fl ~at M~e'Sc~eider of Homestead Multi- <br /> .~'~'~.~. 7, '~';:>~,?,, . ~5'/,[4~~ <br />F~ily Develp~?e'~a'i~'~Jied for stte pl~f~view to develop 42 for-sale to~ome uNts on <br />the prope~xx[omted south';-o}~i 153 Avenue ~ ~, Bill s Supereae ~d e~t of St. Fr~ms <br />Boulev~&:~;~. ~7).' ~e ~ject prope~ is 3~rommately- 10.1 o a~es ~d is cu=ently zoned <br />R-3 Uffi~'~;[es~dentmi, w~' allows up to .s~jeff umts per a~e. ~e cu=ent Comprehensive <br />PI~ t'~getg'~t~s, site-for:~,~.;medim denm~?I?ldentlal of up to seven umts per a~e. ~e draft <br />Comprehens~va~l~.mrgets t~,:~e~f~f~h denslW remdentml uses ~d ~gh de~W has been <br />estabhshed .at a ~um dens~W of seven brats-per acre: ~e .proposed' 42 tow~ome umts <br />.~~,;ceq~'at~,to a goss dem~of 4.2 umts p~ acre ~d a net d~s~W of 4.4 rots p~ acres (net. dens~W <br /> . . . . <br /> Supere~e, Ra~]ey-Chmc' ~d Ph~acy). ~e s~te plan. ~s proposing to construct 34 ~ee <br /> bedroom umts ,~ mght one bedroom umts for a total of 42 owneffoccup~ed to~omes. ~e <br /> tow~ome u~eet or exceed ~e minimum floor area, garage ~ea, ~d setback requirements <br /> ~,established ~:~ R-3 district. ~ accord~ce wi~ CiW Code all public sweets will be surfaced <br /> '%~i.th bim~f~k pavement ~d f~shed with concrete curbing. ~e site pl~ also ~dicated that <br /> ~iii~:~'.'~, . .e?,.p~;. . . ~ .... <br /> mdz~du~[,,flnveways will be paved. It h~ been ~e C~W s pohcy to reqmre multi-family <br /> ".5,,J~?~,¢.b?/ . ..... <br /> decampments to prowde some ad&tmnal p~ng nodes for ~est paring. However, prevmus <br /> mill'!family developments were developed on private streets and ~ere may be a public safeW <br /> <br /> Plann~g Commissio~eeember 5, 2000 <br /> Page 8 of 17 <br /> -240- <br /> <br /> <br />