Agenda - Council - 01/09/2001 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

factor associated with developing parking nodes off a public street· Staff requested that the applicant resolve the additional parking spaces issues with the CiLy Engineer and Development Department. Barium and Cobalt Streets are proposed t.o be extended;it~0,,m, the":~:; south into the plat. Barium Street will turn to the west and become 152 a Lane an~n "T into Cobalt Street and Cobalt Street wiIl extend north to 153 Avenue NW. The:p?{ '{ria 6'kte.,s that Cobalt Street will be connected to an existing north/south private driveway,O~i~h~ Bills ~i~ette site and dedication of the private street as a public roadway will be r~ed. No proposed fi.om St. Francis Boulevard NW. The pedestrian/bike path,:isprop6iactto be along the east s~de of T,H. g47. The C~ty passed an ordinance ~[~Ugu~,t' 22, 2000.requmng a five foot s~dewalk on at least one s~de of each through stree~,;;!mall uiqSan, sub&v~s~ons. ~e proposed .s~te plan needs to be mo&fled to include the req~e,d' s~dewalk.' The ~admg plan generally acceptable, the City Engineer is requesting a fe~difications, and clarification on the proposed grade and Ponding. 'A permit fi.om MnD@~i~ilI be req4lreld.'i£or the discharge of " stormwater into theT.H. #47 system. A permit from~ithe"~r Rum..~Ter~iW.~,,ater Management Organization will also be required. The proposed 'develoP~t.,~w,itl(i,iS~ de'iced by municipal · water and sanitary sewer. '.City Code requires exterior wall fiffi~ti-as to consist of face brick, natural stone, pre-cast concrete, finished metal Same panelingY'~i~'x~g!ass.__Th-_e,.~exterio~' wail materials proposed for all of the multi-family units is maintenan'~:~:¢:~ee sic~} and asphalt shingles. This is a deviation fi-om,::C~!~.~ode and will require City C,6h~dit~'approval. The · Parks/Utfl~taes Supervisor ~s requestmgSseveral~pdLficatmns to the proposed landscaping plan. C~ty Code reqmres a 15 foot.boXTer between ex~Stmg re, stdennal developments and proposed high-density developments, Th:~ site pI~i.~s deficien,.t~'~',,thi~ :i'dqukement and should be revised accordingly. It was also noted that ~t aplS~a~.s a fe~;~f!the towr~_ .'gm~ units encroach upon the 15 foot screemng setback and should be adjured l~:ma~ntam c6mp'hance with the setback. Staff · . ~ ,-~',.,~.':~ ;~!~~'' . "~,~ . , recommended S~te:,Ptan~approval contmgd~t~}~pon comphance w~th City Staff Review Letter Mr. Sle~:~presented the C~ssmn w~th col~glre_ndenngs of the proposed townhomes. · -- Cominurnty~kD'evelopment:?2ssmtant' Wald~ho~ted that the Parks/Utihties Supervisor .will be-. meeting with the!3e.v, eI6paff['~dirrg2'~anlzlS~aping issues. . · .' ...~~,_~,~. ~->~'~i~,~'~ers°n Nixt i~ed....,. ~", if the developer had any concerns with .the City Staff Review letter .' if Mike Schne~im, Homeste~/&Multi-Farmly Development, replied no. r. ~i~ "'-i~~' Mr. Sletmer remewed the storm water management plan of the she ~:~:'~,~;Chmrperson;:~ixt questioned what the elevation difference will be between the existing the n~ development. . M~?~i:~r replied *at ~e elevation will be mainly consistent to the existing development. Planning Commission/December 5, 2000 Page 9 of 17' -250- I I I I I I I I I I I I I