Agenda - Council - 01/09/2001 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

roads. Councilmember Hendriksen stated that it would it make more sense to discuss the i~'i~es with the Planning Commission. Mr. McCIown replied that they did meet with Connnission and wanted the Council to understand what their concerns are. He state~iii'~hat there are no dead_ --end si~s along their streets and real estate experts have indicated:'~a{ ~they can expect a depreciati°n of $I0,000 to $12,000 on their property values. Noise,,~&:light'~0ncems are a quality of life issue. The residents were told that there would probably-b~ a;*:Shoppingt'eenter:, built on that site and with a gas station it will draw a lot more pe6P!~!:~: Councilmembi~ Zimmerman replied that they need to provide for some business oppo~tie~ i~3that area and property.has been zoned commercial for many years. Mr. McCi~0~n~.e~hed ti/at the residents object to the gas because there are already enough gas station~:~'!the areg~¢~ Mike Cofield, 5080 Xkimo Court, Ramsey, stated that the property owner state~s.~at Xk~mo ~s an MSA road and ~s 44 feet w~de,' but by Ns calculations .the road ~s only 38:~ feet 'w~de. He stated that his largest complaint xs that the under~ound gas tanks will be lqS~{!~h~ i00 feet fi~qm!:h~s property and that is not acceptable to him.'-He suggested that they-p'}~a~;5'~i~.gas statioi'~}j6~ C.R. #22 and T.H: ~7 ..... · · . ' · " -"~;:5% ..,'g3?:? . .. . _ . . -~ :.~;~ ,~ Motion .carried, Voting Yes: Mayor Cameo, Councilmemb~;~:i'i~erm.~., Hendriksen, Connolly, and Anderson. Voting No: None. '"~;~!:~, Case 6: - . Request for rina!?i~[~X'l~:~'ib~!:~r;;~oliday Acres; Enterprises and~ L~dai;;,Ter ~;i!'~i~mp any Co~u~ Development Director FroI~q-'stated ..ffi~.;"Rick F6&~°f Phoe~x Ente¢fises ~d V,ctor Sacco of Lyndale Tea,nat Compaqg?35:[¢.q~estmg fin~?plat approval to replat Outlot A, B, C and G of~ver'sBend 3* Addition in~'?~;~o~ercial i:6ts generally located on the comer of T.H, ~7 aM,:;~m0kS~eet. ~e pro0~y consists of approximately 6.80 acres and is proposed to.:b~;/pl'aaed int(;~o lots. Lot 1 ~'~}~::b~,)~pproximately 1·40· acres and Lot 2 will be 5·40 acres:?[*%~ proposed p&r~'~l meets the hal~k:~'d~:~idmum lot size requirement, the 100 foot wid~,;~}~ foot depth ,[~rement estab?~¢~5'n ~e-Business Dis~ct. ~e site will derive ~o ,~;3~d*~:~gts Som,,~q-;$;r¢~.: ¢~:[fi~al plat needs to be modified to dedicate access rights along ~;H}~4~*:~*~'t~~}?~e will be se~iced by.mu~cipal sewer and water hcilities. ~e st~**~&~*'drainage and utS'iX*~ easements. ~e provided along ~e perimeters of both ~,:~}i~5}.5~ existing 2~:;f&t..sewer ~d water easement on Lot 2 will also be retained. As a result of a pnor~'a~¢ement w,~";espec~$.:~o?,.~ver s Bend P~k and the Rum ~ver Budge Comdor, ~s pamcular'~}has been exdEptea; $om any p~k dedication. Councflmemb~)~l~e~an.: .. ' ,nqutred ,f ~e prope~ owner would agee to dedicate the right of access to Ce C~;;of Rmsey on the Holiday site. ~q~',sT,~ck Fosters;;~gx~O Evan S~eet, Ek ~ver, rephed ~at ~ey would be wflhng to deal,cate the '*q~t of acC$~k'on the Holiday prope~. Co~W Development Director Frol~ noted that the fight of access will tec~ically be de&OUted to the state. -282- City Council/December 12, 2000 Page I5 of 25