Agenda - Council - 02/13/2001 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I I I I I I I I I ,I I I I received a revised site plan from T & G Land, Inc. The area is generally located to the County Road #116 and north of 141st Avenue in the proposed Gateway North 5. The site plan that was approved by the City Council on January 9, 2001 propose a 39,936 square foot office/warehouse structure and a 20,000 square foot metal building. The revised site plan is proposing to construct a 54,336 square principal building. This is approximately a 14,400 square foot (120' x from the recently approved site plan. The metal panel accessory square feet in size. The Business Warehousing district restricts lot site plan is proposing to construct a total of 74,336 square feet of which equates to approximately a 15 percent lot coverage. Code states that accessory structures shall not exceed 30 principal building. The accessory building equates to space. The previously approved site plan allowed ~ory g-ross floor space of the principal building. remain percent, 11.24 acres. standards. City the gross floor space of the of the gross floor 50 percent of the Motion by Mayor Gamec, seconded by Councilmember for T & G Land, Inc. contingent upon compliance with City 2001. the revised site plan letter dated January 19, Motion carried. Voting Yes: and Zimmerman. Voting No: Case #13: Consider Petition Re Stormwater Subdraina Hendriksen, 7 (Mississippi River City Engineer Jfi~k0WskiYstated that on 9, 2001 a petition was presented to the City Council requ&{ii~g that th~!Gity not con~ sewer project and drop the eminent domain acf~6fi~acquiring dra~i~ge easements border of their properties with the railroad to facilit~t~ th-is storm sewei?:~r. Jankowski a brief history of the project. Ellen Ddlon, 6255 H~Way'#104"~seT;:Presented the Council with an arial map as well as photographs indi'&,~.ng"the trees that wiJi~'have to be removed if the sewer system goes through Mayor G~m~ inauired ifi~t: i~ihe~essary for the trees to be removed. City Engineer J~owski i:~viewed the easement area which indicated that some of the trees will be impacted b~ ?the project. Mayor 6ame~ ihquired if there was any way of moving the project farther north to save the trees. '?' 2';. /" ' .-' City EngLneer Jankowski replied that if the project were moved farther noah theY would be into the ':railroad property. He stated that it could be possible to narrow the size of the easement in City Council/January 23, 2001 Page 25 of 30 -11 O-