My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/13/2001
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2001
>
Agenda - Council - 02/13/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 12:19:08 PM
Creation date
9/4/2003 10:55:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/13/2001
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
285
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Consensus of the Council was to direct staff to work with residents to determine'i'f~ere was an <br />option that would save the trees. ~-4~i~'i?;' ~';~'~'~;ii!ii?~'~ <br /> <br />Ms. Dillon presented pictures of the property on the north side of th~ir~oad tracks <br />showed that there are no trees that would be impacted and noted that there is'~k~ady an easem~ti::i; <br />on the north side of the tracks. /::~' ~;~'"'~:" .... '~'' <br /> <br />Councilmember Zi~e~an replied that the No~hwestem,Be~line is on'the no~h side of the <br /> ~,; · ,.. 4t. <br /> <br />tracks. ,..'~Y; ~- <br /> <br />City Engineer Ja~owski reviewed the noah side of~' ~ri~ks and po~t~'6ut that in order for <br />the pipe to be constructed on that side of the tracks the Ci~-~w6uld hard'to ~g8 under pavement, <br />curb and guaer which would be ve~ expensive. %;:_:..,., <br /> <br />Winslow Holasek, 1159 Andover Boulevard, ~dover, inquired as t~'~at the df~{hnce was from <br />the railroad tracks to the power lines. ~L?'~'?,'~'~ ;~-~.. ~<'~}-~'},:~ <br /> <br />ci, [ngi~e~r Ja~owski reeled ~pr6~imate~y"4'O fee~¢~::.: .... <br /> <br />Mr. Holasek replied that the reason the~}~haVe the p~tiiBn is tsat .~6 project is going to des~oy <br />~mre development of their prope~. ~d. EeasonZiflow's buiidlhg was moved back 20 feet was <br />because the Ci~ has pl~ed on the frontage:road being in E~nt of the properties so now there <br />will be an easement ,in'th~ font and the back'-df the prope~ies whi& will make there prope~ies <br />dimcult to de~elop. ~f th~-PMect was consi~eE.:6~ the north side of the railroad tracks, the <br />Ci, wo~d-ho'f have to obt~: easements and ~ih~;uld not have to remove 100 trees. If the <br />trees ~e'E}~oved as pan ~f:~he project the..:Ci~will be responsible for paying the prope~ <br />ownErS 'fo}' th6se trees re<addition, to the e'~e~ents. ~e trees are not only wind brews, but <br />provide prote~fioh from_the-rail-road ~acks ~nd the co~ercial businesses. Mr. Holasek stated <br />that five altemaii~es Were presented t~ ~ Council and requested that the Council review those <br />:~fibns again and that[a feasibili~ study be completed to compare the costs of constructing ~e <br />Pr~j~:o~ the no~h sid~'0f_me..raikoad tracks <br /> <br /> Mayor Ga~e~replied that th~~ Council has already looked at several alternatives ~d made the <br /> decision to m~ .fo~ard"~ith the cu~ent project. <br /> <br /> Mr. Holasek i~qfiired if awarding of the contract was contingent upon the Ci~ obtaining the <br />proper easements, <br /> <br /> MaYor Gam~c replied that he would assume that it was. <br /> <br /> ~. H01asek stated that the City will not have possession of the land until Aphl. <br /> <br />-120- <br /> <br />City Council/January 23, 2001 <br /> Page 26 of 30 <br /> <br />I <br />! <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> ! <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.