Laserfiche WebLink
Mayor Gamec replied that the City Attorney always verifies that the City has the <br />way and easements before they go ahead with any project. <br /> <br />Mr. Holasek inquired if the Council would be willing to come out and <br />place the issue on the next Council agenda. <br /> <br />and <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec replied that any Councilmember would be willing to <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Anderson, seconded by <br />discussions until February 13, 2001. <br /> <br />to table <br /> <br />Further discussion: Councihnember Anderson stated <br />alternatives'the Council would have at this stage <br />possible to phase the project because it does establish <br />people. City Attorney Goodrich recommended that the <br />financing alternatives. Mayor Gamec noted that if they change <br />project has to be re-bid. <br />for not having the system in place <br />and would not vote in favor ofredt <br /> <br />research what <br />if it would be <br />~urdens on those <br />staff to prepare other <br />process then the <br /> ,-.~'i-~,,,~ . . . <br /> ~a~:been cntm~zed <br /> entire property <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting <br />and Zimmerman. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Hendriksen, Kurak, <br /> <br />Earnest Miller, 6!5~-Highway #10, <br />hts investment ,sUbstantially because he doe <br /> <br /> J~ -. z~,~ . ~:~ ~¢~ . <br />Mayor Gamec rephed that ~¢ Councd has <br />condor i~' ~ area that will:~b~ co~ercial <br />stated ~hht Unfo~natelg it :iS': no[the best <br />Case ~14: AuthbFa'e Leaer Requ~ <br /> <br /> stated that the project will hurt <br />[have much land to begin with. <br /> <br /> ~t the City overall and the Highway #10 <br /> probably include lots being combined. He <br />residential homes. <br /> <br />Extension of 2020 Comprehensive Plan Review <br /> <br />· ,.:(~?i~i. .... Cit~"Adrriinistrator No~n stated that the City-has been working on the 2020 Comprehensive <br />· ~?~;' Plan for'tlie past four ye~;i':.?'.~ formal plan review began on October 4, 2000. ~e 60-day <br />.g~?' review period ended..~ on,D~e~ber~.,,, 3, 2000, ~d ~e. Metropolitan Council extended the review <br />~74~ period for an°~er 60 d~s, as provided by law. ~e review period cu~ently will end on <br />':'~::'~77... Febmau 1, 20012 After a len~hy debate during a work session held with Metropolitan Council <br /> <br />~ '~c;:;?;.;:,Representative Natahe Haas Steffen and Metropohtan staff on Janu~ 16, 2001, it was decided <br />~ ~:~?;";~ to authofize~,~:City Administrator to dra~ a letter for Council approval ~d submission to <br /> ..... ::.:extend the'C6mprehensive Plan review period for an additional four week period. <br /> <br /> Co~il~ember Hendfiksen inquired as why the consultant did not catch the fact that the <br /> co~pmhensive Plan was to go past 2015. <br /> <br />City Council/January 23, 2001 <br /> Page 27 of 30 <br /> <br />-121- <br /> <br /> <br />