Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />i <br />I <br /> <br />Motion by Chairperson Wagner, seconded by Member Riley, to direct staff to receive <br />from Hoisington Koegler to layout a frontage road north of Ramsey Boulevard and from s~nfiSh <br />Lake Boulevard south to the Anoka border. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Wagner, Members Riley, Anders~ <br />Voting No: None. Absent: Members Blaha, LeTourneau and Scheiber. <br /> <br />Ed Hamilton, 6650 Highway #10, Ramsey stated that he is concerned <br />along Highway #10 and requested a copy of the Highway #10 <br /> <br />bein~ <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman indicated the assumption isn't <br />is a long range· plan. <br /> <br />It <br /> <br />Winslow Holasek, Andover, requested clarification <br /> <br />frontage road. <br /> <br />Case #2: Development Agreement with Listul <br /> <br /> City Administrator Norman stated that on May 2, 1996 the into a <br /> Development Agreement with Lismk~dustries. The agreement assistance <br /> totaling $119,525.97. As of this dafki:~ th~:Ci~"~:collected $41,036 fromi.:z~'·~ax increment that <br /> was generated from this property't~ing th'~<~i~i~i!~i'~e ~of $78,489 o "to the City. Listul <br /> Industries first mortgage was foi:eclos~i;~pon by its~ib'a~,ii~}'~ShedfTs sale was conducted on <br /> December 1, 2000 and the property wa~!'~!d to th~ii!~ ~ ~Listul s six month right to <br />redemption. The Listul property is still S'U~j~ct.~!~'.i~f;'perty t~nd increment will continue to <br />be generated from this parcel. The prope~h~):~ minimum'~sessment agreement in place in <br />favor of the City which provides that the mi'iilmum County Assessed value will be $750,000. <br />The City wilt' continue to' receive its requir~d'~!~incmment to reimburse its financial assistance <br />through the generation of taX. increment. In. the:.un!~Iy case the bank would sell the property to <br />a tax-exempt entity, the Gimp's ::increment cou!ct;b?i~st. The options available to the City are as <br />follows:' 1) Sue Listul IndUstries for the a~'fi~ of deficient increment based on the deficiency <br />agreement. As noted, this business ~s in ':£0i:eclosure and the possibility of receiving the full <br />amount owed is not great. 2) The CitY can continue to collect increment from this parcel under <br />-'?its current tax status and reimburse itself for the financial assistance provided. Staff <br />'recommended that the City take no legal action in regards to a lawsuit against Listul Industries <br />and continue to collect inCrement from the subject property. <br /> <br /> Member Anderson stated that she assumes that when the City makes these agreements they hope <br /> that this type of situation will not happen and questioned if there is something that was missed in <br /> this situation. <br /> <br />Member wagner replied that Listul Industries had been in the City of Ramsey for quite some <br />time prior tO' the building being built. He inquired if it would be possible for the City to include <br />as part of the development agreement that if a situation similar to this were to occur the property <br />could, not be sold to a tax exempt entity. <br /> <br /> Economic Development Authority/January 8, 2001 <br /> Page 3 of 4 <br /> <br />-11- <br /> <br /> <br />