Agenda - Council - 02/13/2001 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Ron Hunt, 17455 Nowthen Boulevard, Ramsey, stated that the Planning Commis~i~d discussed the setback requirement fi.om neighboring structures of 1,5 times 'the_:....hd~h~~' of the scenario, the person who is collecting the fee on the tower cart,Pl'aee the,~r..~., -;-__ _t°wer Under that tower. on the back part of the ten acres, which doesn't affect him, but does imp~t ~the ne~g2bonng property. In the proposed tower overlay district, there already are gas l~i:!'~nd which has to devalue their property. His property has already been e~ficantly de~:~4~ because of the four in forty requirement. He recommended that t~ers b~alIowed on property so that the City can receive the profits of the tower. ~ ¢~-~:~ii!7:~: ~i)~ Councilmember Hendriksen noted that the four in forty stipi~iafi0n has n6ihing to do with the City of Ramsey, but is a restriction of the Met Council..Z,~ :Mayor ~f~:Eagan is correct, it may be that the Met Council does not have the authority to.:~P6se that rest?i'fiiiOn. He stated that if a property owner is permitted to put a tower up adjaceffl~'i~ ~'~roperty lirf~t.!iih~ !here is a 1.5 times the height of the tower setback requirement from th~ adja~t{'~uilc~}- th~"it encumbers the neighboring property from building on his property which is Mr. Hunt replied that there should be some consideration for the adjad'~t Prop~?' Community Development Director4i~/~>Ii~'~{:~i~l;~Tthat.,the ordinance could-G~ended so that the setback has to be from the neare~tproperty hne. "-'~,i.; :.::~¢~: ..... C0uncilmember Kurak inquired if incre~Si~ the pro~ size'~¢ ::~;:~':~cres or 20 acres and change ~e setback requirements and eliminate thg~h~ed f6~sihe overla~di:;~fict. Councilmembez zi~e~ reco~ended?sepding the Tower Ordinance back to Pla~ing Co~ission. t-6~.address ~e'~'~tback requirement: 4~t'~ Motio~:~';~ouncilmember~f~eman, seconded'by Councilmember Hendfiksen, to introduce Motion c~ed ~::~fi~ Yes' M~}~'~'~'~-~ec, Councilmembers Zi~e~, Hendfiksen, ~d · , t g ... ,~::;~:~aerson. Voting No~5.~ouncdmember Kur~. Motion b~Councilmemb~Zmem~, seconded by Councdmember Henddksen, to approve Resolution ~0~01-008, ide~f~ing the boundaries of the Tower Overlay District. Motion c~e~'~.Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Zi~e~an, Hendfiksen, ~d ~derson. Vo(~ No: Councilmember Kurak. Case ~107;;~: Adopt Ordnance to Amend Park Dedication Requirements it~was tabled until Januaw 16, 2001 I I I I I I I I' I I I I I I I I I -184- City Council/January 9, 2001 Page 31 of 34