Agenda - Council - 03/27/2001 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

· NOTE CITY COUNCIL MINUTES i) City Council regular meeting minutes dated January 23, 2001 2) City Council regular meeting minutes dated February 13, 2001 COMMISSION BUSINESS Case #1: Request for Site Plan Review; Case of Ronald E. Johnson'5~ i?~ Principal Plier rmdgeon stated that Mr. Jonson is request~':;:S~'~ P'~eview to consmct a garage on the co~ercial potion of his prope~ in the P~n~G.e~ EstateS~2"d Addition pla~ed unit development (PUD). ~s PUD is zoned for a com6~fi0n of rmdential and co~ercial uses. Mr. Jonson is a concrete contractor ~d he is p~;ing to co~ct a 2,400 squ~e foot garage to house his veUcles and equipment. The:~(S~e equates.~ t~:~}~(~;ibL coverage of .03 percent. ~s is in accord~ce wi~ the City's general Co~d~ciat:r~iati~ of restricting ~e building coverage to 30 percent of ~e co~ercial prope~ siz;: ~.~e(;oven~ts for the Pineview Estates res~ct the front 200 feet of the prope~ for the residenti~[~e,~ Mr. Jonson's building is proposed to be set back 240 feet from the prope~ line. ~e buil~h~}~meets~:~¢Other setbacks ~d will be fi~shed with vinyl lap,:dd'~g: >Access to the building is '~P~6~e~~ to be a paved driveway along the co~on prdP~'ii~e:~i~ .Lpt 8, in accordas~:~'~i~h the coven~ts. However, the driveway width prop'¢s~'i,s ~ee~feet~{'efieieg~ of ~ l~2f6°t width requirement established in the covenants. 'A-i~o, the'~:s~e plan refl~that:~{he;dfi~eway to the residence is ~ the middle of the lot and does not extend'~bm the,gd~;n pr;~9~;line with Lot 8. ~s results ~ ~o driveways and ~is is in conflict":;~Mth:.-~e~J-~:Eoven~m ~nd should be addressed by the homeowners association. In accordance wl~h~;~d~ven~ts, ~'~ Jonson is providing t~ee rows of pine ~ees be~een th~.reSidential and co~cial potions of the prope~. Act~g Cha:~}son Johnso~(uired if m. Jo~d~:~d any concerns with the CiW staff review Ron Jo~Son,':~428 :t49~;-' Avm~e~;. ;gmsey, replied no. He. explained that he has the driveway as 12 fdetbec~use it is Iocatedh~'~ar his drain field, but tM~s he can make it work at 15 ~.~;:'~: ~L':~'~. Jonson '~i~ ~ted that he will work with the homeowners association regarding ~e Motion by C6~issioner4Wi-~0da, seconded by Co~issioner Watson, to reco~end that Ci~ Council ~ant'~e plan approval to ~. Jonson's site pl~ for Lot 7 contingent upon compli~ce with Ci~ staff're~iew le~er dated March 1, 2001 and the Pineview Estates 2nd Addition PUD. x~(~"~.Motion C~/ Voting Yes: Acting Chai~erson Jonson, Co~issioners Wivoda, Watson, '~ :~' ~d Reeve::~ V0'~ing No: None. Absent: Chai~erson Nixt and Co~issioner Kociscak. Planning Commission/March 6, 2001 Page 2 of 6 I I I I I I I I' I I I ! I I I