My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 03/27/2001
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2001
>
Agenda - Council - 03/27/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 12:20:19 PM
Creation date
9/4/2003 11:20:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
03/27/2001
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
235
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />Commissioner Watson inquired if there had been any issues in the past with private street <br />City. <br /> <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon replied that every City deals with some issues <br />streets. The one problem with private streets is that they are typically not <br /> <br />priv~e <br /> <br />Mr. Black explained that the private streets would be constructed to the <br />City streets and by allowing private streets they would be able to <br />the property. There will be a large association that will maintain <br /> <br />~erties. <br /> <br />Acting Chairperson Johnson inquired about the lot that does <br /> <br />the sc ~ack requirements. <br /> <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon explained that a lot must <br />and the lot is approximately 60 feet at the <br />variance, redraw the lot lines, or the City could require a <br /> <br />wide <br /> <br />5~foot setback mark <br /> apply for a <br /> <br />Mr. Black replied that it would be their intention to build on the <br />width requirement. <br /> <br />it ets the 80-foot <br /> <br />Acting Chairperson Johnson ' <br /> <br />permit a further <br /> <br />Mr. Black replied yes. <br /> <br />Acting Chairperson Johnson inquired <br /> <br />Mr. Black replied?hat'he,Wbu~d have to <br /> <br />Co~issi6fieFWatson state~.~at he would <br />cogent'ire'two development:: He feels that <br />the dCvei;~m~,if <br />to the senior <br /> <br />e any shoreland, <br /> <br />that issue. <br /> <br /> leaving Fluorine as a cul-de-sac and not <br /> neighbors would be more receptive of <br /> with the connection of the townhome units <br />could have on traffic along Dysprosium Street. <br /> <br /> ~,~;,?~-:7~'~ihe~-,Chair~erson inquired if the developer had any contact with the neighborhood to <br /> the nO~ o~,the <br /> <br /> Mr. Black r;51i~d ~at th~hCe not held any neighborhood meetings at tbs poim. <br /> <br /> Acting Chai¢~0n Jonson stated that the de~ee ~ w~ch the developer provides accurate <br /> tnfo~ation to.,~,~e adjacent residents will be a benefit to ~e develOpment. People who live along <br />~:~:?:~?~,:;;3odine will be ~pacted by the traffic ~d even though he believes the project looks good, people <br /> "~:%]~ image~,,S;~s of things in the absence of accurate ~fo~ation. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/March 6, 2001 <br /> Page 5 of 6 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.