My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/10/2001
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2001
>
Agenda - Council - 04/10/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 12:20:53 PM
Creation date
9/4/2003 11:44:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/10/2001
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
269
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
petition with 93% objecting to the project. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich stated the City's Charter would prohibit that from occurrin <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec pointed out that if the project is petitioned against and the then <br />major repmr would be needed and 100% of the cost would be assessed. ;~:; i,~:i <br /> <br /> ..... ~. <br />Mr. Wrobel stated they will petition for the road to be mmntmned::~ the-~o~,.ect way <br /> ........ ~, ~:!~ ~;~: ~4¢;.~' <br />obwously, people are not dmng thmr jobs and mmntmmng the roa~ ~ sho~l~ <br /> <br /> . '%~. <br />Mayor Gamec stated he takes exceptmn w~th those co~en~¢~fi'fle agmnst C1W Staff. He stated <br />he understands that Mr. Wrobel ~s ~strated w~th th~¢eess but should not result ~n <br />derogative comments against CiW Staff. <br /> <br />Mr. Wrobel stated that is his opinion ~d noted that he tb::~get the silages <br />~om his block and no others, which would not be 55%· <br /> <br /> Mayor Gamec stated that opportunity ould still be allowed for 60 t t. <br /> <br /> Loretta Olson, 6631 155th m a manua[~fmsed to determine if <br /> a road improvement is needed, <br /> <br /> CiW Engineer Olson explained that staffdfives in the CiW, 134 miles of <br /> roads. <br /> <br /> Loretta Olson ~ed. abOutTthe standing watef~q~ the roads. <br /> <br /> City Eng~.e~ Olson stated.; ~fjthat ~ssue was ~::~;to staff it could have been looked at but, <br /> instead~~'a petition was subm~2ed that the proj ~[2~:S~0uld not go fo~ard. <br /> <br /> Loretta Olson';s~t~ th~' in the same spots so she believes that means the <br /> City is not addre~k::th; problem. <br /> <br /> :er Olson stat~:the r~on for the public he~g is to receive t~s input so those areas <br /> can be ad~ysed and <br /> <br /> Loretta Olson''s~ated the letter she received just said they were doing the overlay and did not <br /> indicate there ii. at'ce~ain way to co~ect the road or to fix the most damaged areas. <br /> <br />'%..7 Councilmemb~', Zimme~an stated last ye~ ~o roads in ~spefing Pines had similar <br /> :;;~ problems a~d'~eeded culve~s. In that case, the drainage was co~ected at the same time the <br /> '6V2rlay,~hS'~done. <br /> <br /> M'aY0~ Gamec stated a lot of times co~ents are made dung the public .heating about standing <br /> <br />City Council/March 13, 2001 <br /> Page 15 of 31 <br /> <br />,O7 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.