My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/10/2001
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2001
>
Agenda - Council - 04/10/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 12:20:53 PM
Creation date
9/4/2003 11:44:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/10/2001
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
269
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
water or "birdbath" areas which can be corrected during such a project. <br /> <br /> City Engineer Olson stated it is only with a project of this magnitude that a correcfi6~i':iike that <br /> can successfully be made. <br /> <br /> Loretta Olson stated there are some cracks in High Point but they want the p6th0'les <br /> <br /> Ma or Gamec stated with the petition that was submitted, the projeet will':n~:~Proceed so <br /> normal repair will be conducted. He suggested that the City Engineer~et w~th'~res~dents of this <br /> project to address their concerns and, perhaps, hold another hea~g? '~ (i;!:i~- <br /> City Attorney Goodri,',c~h read the Section 4.50.01 Streets,.:S~'~(dsion 3~Seal Coating, paragraph <br /> e., which indicated: In the event the benefited propeff½'}5~ners petiti;~'~0 defeat a sealcoating <br /> project, the benefited property owners will be asse~:"~010.%, of the c6~ 7~hen the sealcoating <br /> improvement is finally completed. The reason for this 100%,ass~S~en~ i'~~ ...... that the cost of <br /> sealcoating is substantially increased when a street has missed ii~0f~ally scheduled sealcoating <br /> maintenance, which sealcoating generally is on an every six-year sah~du/e." <br /> <br /> Director of P'ublic Works Kapler:::~atfi~":~i~i~¢~)ll schedule a neighborh6'0~ meeting to receive <br /> <br /> Loretta Olson stated she is willing to pa2¢' fdr the proj~{ ~i' it <br /> <br /> Councilmember Henddksen noted this is ri0(::~e¢:{i/pical time'~a petition is submitted but if it is <br /> officially receiv~it.h~:k. ~impact on how much the residents and City will pay. He asked if the <br /> residents shoutd hold the P~fi~on until the apPi:0Pfiat~:fime and after learning of the implications <br /> <br /> City~RO~eYZ:Goodfich'!~staied~:the reside/it~;:~ould hold the petition for 60 days unti! the <br /> neighb°rh0od m ating'i ihdd d; d rd o Ved. <br /> <br /> .~:/.<C01incilmember Heii~en explained that receiving the petition tonight will "tie the hands" of <br />:: ifc :?:fi~iCi~i ~Ouncil in wh~ey .ca~ do. <br /> Mr. Wrobel ~ted he will' ~.~draw the petition on the condition that a meeting is held and they <br /> can discuss the:,Pt°blems':~::, <br /> <br /> Director of Pul~li~ Works Kapler committed to holding the meeting within 30 days. <br /> <br /> ':~i:: Mr. Wrobei:S(ated if their concerns are not resolved, he Mil be fight back to resubmit the <br /> '~efition; (:-!~: ~' <br /> <br /> Motion to by Councilmember Kurak, seconded by Councilmember Hendfiksen, to close the <br /> <br />City CounciVMarch 13, 2001 <br /> Page 16 of 31 <br /> <br />-98- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.