Agenda - Council - 04/10/2001 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

should desire staff could bring back a proposal for consideration to purchase the property froma willing seller at the assessed value. :: .~:-:/ "'~'-"'~ '-ii': Councilmember Zimmerman inquired if Highway #10 is upgraded to freeway 51~dard what would it do to the property along Highway #1 0. City Administrator Norman replied that if Highway #10 is changed to 4~,~ay standards:-~the State would try and eliminate accesses from Highway #10. Councilmember Zimmerman stated that until they get some inp~.fi~;~' '~[~i;State and County as' to What the road will look like in the future it is not appropriafe i0"be purchaSe'lng the land. Mayor Gamec inquired if it would it is beneficial to kno~::~fi~ value of~i~4'koperty at this time. City Administrator Norman stated that staff would ~t a li-'"~f?~f the.!~i~he 3~:~e properties for their review from the Courthouse. Consensus of the Council was to directstaff to provide information o~!;th'e value;~the properties Motion by Councilmember A:: derson,_/seconded'by~.G6'unci!member Zimmerman, to direct the City Attorney to extend the condemnati0n hearings f0,r.t,6~d~m;-- Motion carded. Voting Yes: Mayok_gamec4~:CouncilmPmbers ~mderson, Zimmerman, Hendr/ksen, and Kurak. Voting No: NoneT:.~:..f;!7'i, / Case #6:/~';,-:i','~equest for ~ik Plan Review ~i'Sii~h Gateway Development; Case of ~.:_,-:7,.:_ Sharp and ASsOciates, L.L.C/:".,.i;::'.~i)~: -- city Adminis-~°r !~o~a'at-ata-mat.7;~a;eity of Ramsey has received a request for site plan review from sharp~)anaTXssociates, L.L.~" The site plan is proposing to construct a multi-tenant ~*6ffi~/warehouse/sh6Wi'oom structure on 9.7 acres. .The area is generally located in the :7'":r~14weSfcorner of M~Kinley Sk'NW and Sunfish Lake Boulevard. The City Council reviewed the propoSed-site plan at it's'- Feb~ary 27, 2001 meeting and tabled the request until access issues onto Sunfish Lake.,, :;,~ Boulevard~'~vere...;~..~. resolved between the City, the developer, and Anoka County. City Engineer Jankowski explained that Anoka County recommended that no access be granted along Sunfish~ake Boulevard, but if an access were to be granted they recommended that it : occur directl3~ adross from Sunfish Lake Court. The advantage to aligning the accesses is that .Sunfish LakeBoulevard will possibly be improved with a divided median down the center and it would be: more likely to get an opening in the median having to accesses across from each other. The' other issue is that Mate property has an access a few feet north of Sunfish Lake Court and if the'divided median was installed it would be limited from left turn movements from Sunfish -118- City Council/March 20, 2001 Page 4 of I2 I I I