My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/10/2001
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2001
>
Agenda - Council - 04/10/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 12:20:53 PM
Creation date
9/4/2003 11:44:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/10/2001
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
269
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Lake Boulevard. Staff recommended that the proposed access be moved to be <br />from Sunfish Lake Court. <br /> <br />Dennis Sharp, Sharp and Associates, L.L.C., requested that the access be left <br />stated that if a median is constructed a right-in and right-out would be more <br />would have to be done with an access at the north end of the I: <br />located across from Sunfish Lake Court they would have to <br />"snake" through the property. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman stated that in his opinion the <br />department, and he felt that the City would be better off in <br />the Counties recommendation. <br /> <br />run <br /> <br /> zed. He <br /> what <br />W~ <br /> <br />with the highway <br />went along with <br /> <br />Mr. Sharp replied that they designed the buildin ~ossible and if <br />the frontage road is required they will have to remr~ve stated that <br />during the last Council meeting there was some discussion the use of colored block <br />and there seemed to be an assumption that he was placing -~ cc~,lors of colored <br />block to get under a City ordinance. He explained that he did not knoW'ih'at the;Ci~ had such an <br />ordinance and since the meeting he or&nance and still is nof~e ',~t there is such a <br />requirement. In the future Is vocabulary ~}!~, <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec stated that he would work well <br />for the site. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Hendriksen stated that Ci N~ has indicated a possible site <br /> for QCTV be loci~ted: aci-0'S~ the street fi'om ~i~;::,Sh~'s proposed access and if so would it make <br /> sense to determifi~ if there':![gi~ desire to worl~ g out with QCTV and if so approach the <br /> .~: ,, , . ~';~ :~:-! . . ';~ ~: c-!,4~ ,~~ <br /> access locatmn from a different direction. <br /> <br /> C~ty Admm~sffator No~ rewewed the po~sible location for QC~. <br /> <br />:¢':'~d' for that reason t~ccess probably would not wOrk. <br />~r. Sha~' ~t~d that movi~g;Sd~sh ~ak~ Cou~ would be ~ expensive solution. <br />Mayor Gamec{S~ted that'the reco~endation of the Coun~ is the best option. <br />Ci~ Enginee[,~owski reviewed the possibili~ of relocating Sunfish L~e CouP. _ <br /> <br /> Councilmember ~derson inquired how Mate would have access from Sunfish Lake Boulev~d <br /> i~e. ~des'k;if moved ~nher south. <br /> <br /> M~7or Gamec replied that an easement would have to be ganted to Mate to use the access. <br /> <br />City Council/March 20, 2001 <br /> Page 5 of 12 <br /> <br />-119- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.