My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/10/2001
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2001
>
Agenda - Council - 04/10/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 12:20:53 PM
Creation date
9/4/2003 11:44:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/10/2001
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
269
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen replied that there was a great deal of interest, by large <br />build a Riverdale at the intersection of Round Lake Boulevard and Main Street <br />happen because the fiver bridge crossing never happened at Riesling <br />Ramsey fully intends on having a fiver bridge crossing and he assumes that <br />interest for major businesses to locate in that area. <br /> <br /> not <br />City of <br /> large <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak stated that Highway #10 is not going to be,: <br />The site will be developed under a planned unit development by <br /> <br />one <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen replied that what is being <br />should be done. The commercial should be located <br />industrial away from the intersection. <br /> <br /> is the opposite of what <br />major intersection and the light <br /> <br /> Councilmember Kurak stated that the land between and Armstrong <br /> Boulevard is the biggest asset to Ramsey and she does not should be limited to <br /> only one use. She suggested zoning the entire parcel commer~ii ustrial ~d then let the <br /> market determine what will go in there. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Hendfiksen'*?":' the intersectio st of ~sWong <br /> Boulevard is more appropdat~'~%'::a~ed use" be~een ~;trong Boulev~d and <br /> Ramsey Boulevard, but he wa;'h~6ping id~et input does not underst~d why <br /> the City would want to replicate somei~hg ' downtown ~oka is not <br /> marketable. <br /> <br /> Councilmembe~ Zi~an stmed that ~o¢ study ~ea should include ~e emire ~ea <br /> ~om C.R. g56 and C.R. ~83 south of C.R. <br /> <br /> Mayor Gamec requested staffto dete~ine if ~CiW could work with Cai Tho¢ on studying the <br /> e~[lre -SI[~. ',.. ~- ': 2..,75:?~?;? ....... <br /> <br /> Mr. Levine replied ~athe would contact Cal ~o~. <br /> <br />:,~:; - :: : ...... <br />~'- ': "" Counci~mber Hendfi~n stat~,that_ the study ~ea should not end at ~strong Boulev~d. <br /> <br /> Mayor Gamec updated the CoUncil as to the stares of ~e river bhdge crossing s~dy that is to be <br /> completed. '~: ~:?.~ ..... <br /> <br /> Couneilmemb~' ~derson noted that if the CiW of Ramsey does not have an approved <br /> "%~), :'. ComprehensiVe'Plan then the City will not receive the ~ts for ~e fiver bhdge study. <br /> <br /> Mayor, Gmec replied that the Joint Powers A~eement is already completed ~d he did not t~ <br /> that:~e.study had an:hing to do with the Ci~ of Ramsey's comprehensive plan. <br /> <br />City Council/February 20, 2001 <br /> Page 5 of 6 <br /> <br />-43- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.