Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />:1 <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br />'1 <br /> I <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec stated the final decision on how the project will be paid for will have to <br />by the Council when the project is brought forward. <br /> <br />Finance Officer Lund noted that she will make the change to the CIP. <br /> <br />Motion by Mayor Gamec, seconded by Councilmember Anderson to <br />Council adopt the City of Ramsey's Capital Improvement Program for <br />noting that this is a forecasting tool and not actual, committed <br />financing being changed for the storm drainage project. <br /> <br />with <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, <br />and Zimmerman. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case #2: <br /> <br />Consider Authorization of <br />Addendum <br /> <br />Services <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman stated that the City contracted for <br />Koegler Group Incorporated (HKGi)~,~on May 20, 1999, to <br />redevelopment along the <br />November 2000. As part of <br />Boulevard and Ramsey <br />road system. The study disc~/s~ed <br />where a frontage road system would <br />Authority (EDA) directed HKGi to <br /> <br /> Hoisington <br /> study for <br /> accepted in <br />Sunfish Lake <br />proposed frontage <br />made a recommendation <br />Economic Development <br />services with two additional <br /> <br /> segments. The two,additional segments north Si'~'~ of Highway #10 from Sunfish <br /> Lake Boulevard'to:.the'An0ka/Ramsey corp0~ hm~ts and the north s~de of H~ghway #10 from <br /> Ramsey Boul~;a~d to wh~?~!the Highway gl3~)~f-way and BNSF right-of-way intersect. <br /> The amend~nei~t to the stu~ii!would be simii~i~ e original study that would include the <br /> evaluati6n and graphical pr'b~ntation of exi ;nditions, opportUnities and constraints, and <br /> the preparation of a frontage.mad, an re~?pment concept for each segment of the corridor. <br /> HKGi would"~c0~plet6?ith{§::~t~e~: for a fee not to exceed $5,000. During. the EDA <br />meeting of Febr~a~:2'f,' 2001, it wa~'~;eco~'~mmended that the City Council consider authorizing <br />· .~.:::',ithel H:KG~ H~ghway.~810. redevelopment study addendum for a not-to-exceed cost of $5,000. <br />':~:~;~:~::' Funding.f6r.~the serviceS,w0uld:~me from the EDA fund. <br /> <br /> Motion by ~or <br /> Gamec;:seConded by Councilmember Kurak, to recommend that City Council <br /> authorize HrO!':i'to perf0'~ a ~ighway #10 redevelopment planning study addendum not to <br /> exceed $5,000.!~' <br /> <br />~??(~:.Further discu'~si6n: Councilmember Zimmerman inquired if the planning study will include <br />.~:maps. City Administrator Norman replied that the main part of the study includes maps of the <br />area and a layout of the frontage road. Councilmember Hendfiksen stated that everyone expects <br />that:there will be bridge in the area of Armstrong Boulevard, which may cause some realignment <br />of Highway #10, and inquired why the City would want to spend money on a frontage road plan <br /> <br />Finance Committee/February 27, 2001 <br /> Page 3 of 5 <br /> <br />-47- <br /> <br /> <br />