My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/24/2001
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2001
>
Agenda - Council - 04/24/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 12:21:05 PM
Creation date
9/4/2003 11:57:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/24/2001
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
274
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-170- <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt noted there are access rights to Highway #10 and Mn/DOT has preliminary <br />indicated a willingness to provide at least one. <br /> <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon noted the applicant is requesting an additional access from Mn/DOT <br />but they are not required to provide a second access. He stated that he thinks a solution can be <br />found. <br /> <br /> Chairperson Nixt asked if one access is sufficiently distant fi.om the intersectior~ .to provide a <br /> reasonable deceleration and acceleration lanes. <br /> <br /> Pr/ncipal Planner Trudgeon stated Mn/DOT has indicated they do not car_ e'for the location of the <br /> current access so he believes something will be' worked out to relocate~t:;~; <br /> <br /> Chairperson Nixt stated he does not like the location of the;!tfm: western acces'~Sand..would <br />recommend it be removed. ~" ' <br />Mr. Winkel stated the distance from the intersection l~0:th~' existing ac~deks is about 350 feet so <br />moving it half-way in-between would add 150 feet or eqtmI)about 500'.feet from the intersection. <br />He noted the access would be 150 to 200 feet to the mobilehom~-Pfoperty line. He stated they <br />can get an adequate turn lane as indicated and moving it farth~it will make it even longer. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt asked if M_n/DOT has stan~t~heet. <br /> <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon stated they do havi-standar&-'and ~:?sponse from Mn/DOT will <br />probably indicate what they are ......... ':-':'-¢" ¢:'4;~ <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt restated tha-~-'he, dbes 'not like tl4~;-ti~cess on the western side and would leave it <br />up to Mn/DOT and the. aPPlicant to determine. ~ the~ ii~pmpfiate location for an access. He stated <br />he likes the site layout and believes.lit-w'iLl~.tremendo~l~y improve the comer lot. <br /> <br />Motion by Comm~smoner Reeve', seconded by Chmrperson N~xt, to recommend that the City <br />Council ~an[iaPProyal of~e i~rgposed site plan for a retail center contingent upon compliance <br />with C~i..St~iff-:Revi~ew Letter'~dated March 30, 2001, and receiving a var/ance from the <br />imp.e~mus surface "~eSff'ic$ions'~:~0~ the Board of Adjustment, contingent upon satisfactory <br />resoIution with Mn/DOT;-'~in the lodafion of one access off Highway gl0 serving the property <br />w~iappropriate easements..between Lots I and 2 should Mn/DOT request the relocation of the <br /> <br />Motion carried._ ~VotingYes: Chairperson Nixt, Commissioners Reeve, Kociscak, Watson, and <br />Wivoda. otlngNo:None. Absent: Commissioner Johnson. <br /> <br />Case%rT~"--,,Request for Sketch Plan Review of Nord¥ik Addition; Case of4}erek Nordvik <br /> <br />Community exp{~&-q:h?~i-Derek Nordvik has submitted a <br />subdivision application to split his 5.~acre~'h'~0.~two lots. He intends to build a home <br />for h/s mother on the new lo¢.created. C~ty Code does nryt~ar.e a pubhc heanng for minor <br /> <br /> " Planning Commission/April3, 2001 Page 16 of 18 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />i <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.