Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt called the regular meeting of the Planning Commission back to order <br />p.m. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt stated his concern that this location is <br />equipment building is of a substantial size. He asked about the uniquenes <br />requires equipment structure of this size as opposed to other <br />magnitude. <br /> <br />Mr. Nelson stated until six weeks to eight weeks ago, Verizon <br />by 20 foot equipment structure, as had other companies. <br />incorporate an on-site generator to keep the site from <br />failure. He advised that Verizon has determined that <br />larger sized building to accommodate that generator. <br /> <br />the <br /> <br />used a 12 foot <br />is desire'ted to <br />down should there be a power <br />wi11 be asking for a <br /> <br /> Chairperson Nixt asked if this is a corporate decision or as a obligations that <br /> require maintaining readiness at these sites. <br /> <br /> ~. Nelson stated he ~s unable to ~a~er;~hag~ question but ~ows ~t ~s mgcaI;m'~ the bus~ness of <br /> cellular commumcat~ons to keep ~1 S~tes op~a~On~. ' <br /> <br /> Chm~erson N~xt noted t~s ~ould be¢~; fi~fly large:,;~ e::,:f~}~e C~W to construct and <br /> mmntaln should there be a total of~ee eo21ocators <br /> <br /> ~. Nelson explai~d ~t the cu=ent eqmPm~?eeded will aot fill ths bmldmg, but Venzon is <br /> not interested ~ ~fi~g. a building that'~g~as to be expanded to h~dle on-going ch~ges in <br /> <br /> Co~issi0n~r Kocisc~ ask~dSWhat the towe[g~;~me~ures. <br /> <br /> ~. Nelson Stat~,~he,Old;t°we~;b}~"i~"5~sFeet ~n dmmeter. He poNted out that ~e proposed <br /> placement of th~:bfifldN~ is easVwe~t~¢~dicul~ to ~e tower base. <br /> <br /> 55' · "/ ,'; *z,.. "~:" <br /> Comssmner Kociscak:hsked ~hat the heist of the building is. <br /> <br /> Mr. Nelson:~iwered it m,t~Sfeet hgh. <br /> <br /> Co~issioner'"~ivoda inquired reg~dNg ~e appropriate action since ~e CiW Council is <br /> studying this isSUe. <br /> <br />":':"~?57Chaicerson Ni'~t suggested consideration include additional conditions such as relocation to a <br /> "C~¢::~~. He stated it is bce to see the applicant is willing to provide screeNng to ~s <br /> ext~'t bUt'he would like staff to assure it would not be impacted by another buildNg. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/April 3, 2001 <br /> Page 5 of 18 <br /> <br />-191- <br /> <br /> <br />