My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/24/2001
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2001
>
Agenda - Council - 04/24/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 12:21:05 PM
Creation date
9/4/2003 11:57:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/24/2001
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
274
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chairperson Nixt called the regular meeting of the Planning Commission back to order <br />p.m. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt stated his concern that this location is predominantly the <br />equipment building is of a substantial size· He asked about the <br />requires equipment structure of this size as opposed to other are not <br />magnitude. <br /> <br />Mr. Nelson stated until six weeks to eight weeks ago, Verizon~C~mm~ations used a 12 foot <br />by 20 foot eqmpment structure, as had other ompames. T~]ttonal 1~0 feet ]s designed to <br />incorporate an on-site generator to keep the site Eom should the~e be ~ <br />failure. He advised that Vefizon has dctc~ined that w~]] be asMn~ fo~ a <br />]~Se~ sized building to acco~odatc that 8, <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt asked if this is a corporate decision or as a <br />require maintaining readiness at these sites. <br /> <br />obligations that <br /> <br />Mr. Nelson stated he is unable to <br />cellular communications to keep <br /> <br />uestion but knows it is <br /> <br />business of <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt noted this <br />maintain should there be a total of three' <br /> <br />City to construct and <br /> <br /> Mr. Nelson explained ;that the current fill this building, but Verizon is <br /> not interested in.,c¢~i~Cilng a building tha s to be expanded to handle on-go'ing changes in <br /> technology. <br /> <br /> Co~isgiOfier Kociscak as~fl~what the tower ~easures. <br /> <br /> Mr. Nelson stat~ the~old~tower;:,.}~;;~8?~30}:,feet m d~meter. He pmnted out that the proposed <br /> placement of th;:~Uii~ is easffw~:¢~ndicular to the tower base. <br /> <br />· ~,¢:?~-¢~:';'C6~is~i~er Koc~sca~:~ked ~hat the height of the bmld~ng is. <br /> Mr. Nelson a~ered ~t ~s~,¢feet ~gh. <br /> <br />~;;~?:~,~ Commissioner~'~ivoda inquired regard~g ~e appropriate action since the Ci~ Council is <br />_ ~'~?:~ studying this iSSd~. <br /> <br /> "~:~i~Chmcerson N~xt suggested consideration ~nclude additional conditions such as relocation to a <br /> · C~. Ctrucmre. He stated it is nice to see the applic~t is willing to provide screedng to tbs <br /> ext~t'bUt'he would like staffto assure it would not be ~pacted by ~other building. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/April 3, 2001 <br /> Page 5 of 18 <br /> <br />-25- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.