My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/24/2001
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2001
>
Agenda - Council - 04/24/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 12:21:05 PM
Creation date
9/4/2003 11:57:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/24/2001
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
274
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
! <br />! <br /> <br />The public hearing closed at 7:56 p.m. <br />Commission Business <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt called the regular meeting of the Planning Commission <br />p.m. <br /> <br />7:56 <br /> <br />Commissioner Watson noted this revision will prevent the construction oi <br />size. <br /> <br />of a <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski reviewed the wording on Page <br />mining and grading permits are not required. He stated <br />dig a small-sized pond and if all the regulations <br />needing a permit. However, all of the <br />material dug out of the pond or causing a drainage <br />this threshold is used by the Army Corps of Engineers. <br /> <br />be exempt from <br /> )lacement of the <br /> He advised <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt noted the City has lot sizes that vary greatly and <br />surface area of the pond for a <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski <br />is allowed in an area with an' <br />subdivisions have approved grading <br /> <br /> ther,el}~ a hmlt to the <br />~idential lot, <br /> <br /> indicate t~f:no alteration of ~ade <br /> of the smaller lot urb~ <br /> not be allowed. <br /> <br /> Chairperson Nixt suggested that some size be considered for smaller <br /> residential lots./,::~ieii~ S~ction 9.11.18 ...... 3, (c) and suggested <br /> it <br /> should <br /> indicate <br /> ~ · /'".~:';¢2r~ . ~:.:. ~!:, . . ~ ~ . <br /> does not ~nterfere w~th surface drmnage in the~ea -~7~ ' <br /> <br /> Ci~ En~ih~r Ja~ows~ a~d that the Code ~o:~:Z~ld be comected to ~dicate "does not." He <br /> stateff?t~'ff.~fll mak%ffi~t?reyision and~ add l~age to address the issue raised by <br /> Ch~i,,'~rson"~::~pfioi~3::C~di~;~ tion.-."He reviewed ~e ma~mum ~ading slope <br /> (12 ~)that is al~d~:~'~esidential s~¢~dion. <br /> <br />~f%?~'F~'~e.,reference, Ch~ers~:~Nixt asked staff to dete~ine whether ~e Apple ~dge/~ver <br /> Pines subdihsion complie~:~ith'~hat maximum slope ~ade restriction. He also asked that tbs <br /> ~ssue be rms~ dunng the,~mre ord~n~ce mendment dlscuss~on. <br /> <br /> Co~issioner"~'voda asked if this just impacts resldent~al propemes or would ~t also ~mpact <br /> soccer fields. /;~7 ' <br /> <br /> '(:::':~:~:~C~ty Engmeer;Ja~owski stated that soccer fields ~e probably at a 2% ~ade. <br /> <br /> C~e~'3n Nixt asked staff to prep~e t~s revision and present me modified ordinance at the <br /> neXtmeeting. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/April 3, 2001 <br /> Page 9 of 18 <br /> <br />-29- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.