Agenda - Council - 06/26/2001 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Case #5: Request for Site Plan Review North Pine Professional Services; Case of SW Wold Community Development Assistant Wald stated that the City has received a'request for site plan review from SW Wold. SW Wold is proposing to construct a 20,075 square foot multi-tenant office and warehouse building on the property generally located off of State Highway #10 and 153rd Avenue (adjacent to Boilermakers Company on the north). The construct a multi-tenant office/warehouse facility on a 2.08-acre parcel. B-1 Business, office facilities are a permitted use. The proposed permitted use and will require a conditional use permit. The reviewing a request for a conditional use permit for warehousing June Planning Commission meeting. The site plan indicates 1,000 square feet and the warehousing area will be 19,075 building exceeds the required fi-ont, rear and side yard District. City Code restricts lot coverage to 35% of the lot coverage. In accordance with City Code, all areas are proposed to be surfaced with bituminous curbing. City Code requires a minimum of 5 parking Past practice is to require 1 parking space spaces in this case. Therefore, the office and warehouse activities. The materials will consist of rock face integrally treated with color. The grading property located to the nort!!~p£Tth~., subject The proposed drainage plan would ~.e maximizing the ponding c,a~Ci~-i~i~i!~,ity pr ~ therefore limiting future developments drainage options. Staff i~"reque~ pre an~!~,ost development capacity calculations to determine the effect,~i~fl~e propos~i~i~lrainage pf~!0n the City owned property and also on surrounding prope~'S'i The de~ei~menti~!i,s;~pr9p~,~g to derive one access point from 153r~ Avenue. Urban Ser~(6~' are n~ti~;~ 'and the facility is proposed to be serVed by an on-site septic systemJ ::, :[f :?the lC~mprehensive p~an is adopted with a policy statement requiring urban semid'ek'~°r !comme~i~ildevelopment, Staff is recommending that the development permit requim'C6~'~C~i;~:~;~t~:~!iurban'~:~ices within 2 years of availability.' The Landscaping Plan is gen'e~!l:5} acceptablel-~ever tG:~;~plan should be revised to include a tree preservation plan. C~tYi,:'Staff recommended~'gite plan a'i~i~roval contingent upon compliance with City Staff Review Lett~ dated June 1, City Engdn~er.Jankowski!i~iewed the drainage of the site. · -. Chairperson Ni"xt'!~'q~ired as to who would bear the cost of the overflow in the future, City Engineer Jankowski replied that the collection of the storm drainage fees could be used. to ~rty is zoned portion is not a will be [s. tdct at the of .osed in the an ~s proposmg iii~22% and maneuvering with B-6/12 concrete proposed office facility. of warehouse space or 19 serve both the that the exterior wall blocks should be and utilize City owned Planning Commission/June 5, 2001 Page 23 of 30